Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348246›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2013

Emerging functions for the Staphylococcus aureus RNome.

Julien Guillet, Marc Hallier, Brice Felden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Infection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Thirty Years of sRNA-Mediated Regulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcriptome Profiling ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Noncoding RNA.Microbiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  17. RNA-Dependent Regulation of Virulence in Pathogenic Bacteria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Review
  18. Small RNA teg49 Is Derived from aInfection and immunity · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. A long and abundant non-coding RNA inMicrobial genomics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julien GuilletRennes University, Inserm U835-UpresEA2311, Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, Rennes, France.
Marc HallierRennes University, Inserm U835-UpresEA2311, Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, Rennes, France.
Brice FeldenRennes University, Inserm U835-UpresEA2311, Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading pathogen for animals and humans, not only being one of the most frequently isolated bacteria in hospital-associated infections but also causing diseases in the community. To coordinate the expression of its numerous virulence genes for growth and survival, S. aureus uses various signalling pathways that include two-component regulatory systems, transcription factors, and also around 250 regulatory RNAs. Biological roles have only been determined for a handful of these sRNAs, including cis, trans, and cis-trans acting RNAs, some internally encoding small, functional peptides and others possessing dual or multiple functions. Here we put forward an inventory of these fascinating sRNAs; the proteins involved in their activities; and those involved in stress response, metabolisms, and virulence.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Regulatory NetworksHumansRNA, AntisenseRNA, BacterialRNA, Small InterferingStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeRNA, AntisenseRNA, BacterialRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID24348246
PMCPMC3861533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.