Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348236›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Exploring early stages of the chemical unfolding of proteins at the proteome scale.

Michela Candotti, Alberto Pérez, Carles Ferrer-Costa, Manuel Rueda, Tim Meyer, Josep Lluís Gelpí, Modesto Orozco

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michela CandottiInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain ; Joint Research Program in Computational Biology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine and Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto PérezLaufer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Carles Ferrer-CostaJoint Research Program in Computational Biology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine and Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel RuedaSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Tim MeyerTheoretische und Computergestützte Biophysik, Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany.
Josep Lluís GelpíInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Modesto OrozcoInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain ; Joint Research Program in Computational Biology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine and Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After decades of using urea as denaturant, the kinetic role of this molecule in the unfolding process is still undefined: does urea actively induce protein unfolding or passively stabilize the unfolded state? By analyzing a set of 30 proteins (representative of all native folds) through extensive molecular dynamics simulations in denaturant (using a range of force-fields), we derived robust rules for urea unfolding that are valid at the proteome level. Irrespective of the protein fold, presence or absence of disulphide bridges, and secondary structure composition, urea concentrates in the first solvation shell of quasi-native proteins, but with a density lower than that of the fully unfolded state. The presence of urea does not alter the spontaneous vibration pattern of proteins. In fact, it reduces the magnitude of such vibrations, leading to a counterintuitive slow down of the atomic-motions that opposes unfolding. Urea stickiness and slow diffusion is, however, crucial for unfolding. Long residence urea molecules placed around the hydrophobic core are crucial to stabilize partially open structures generated by thermal fluctuations. Our simulations indicate that although urea does not favor the formation of partially open microstates, it is not a mere spectator of unfolding that simply displaces to the right of the folded ←→ unfolded equilibrium. On the contrary, urea actively favors unfolding: it selects and stabilizes partially unfolded microstates, slowly driving the protein conformational ensemble far from the native one and also from the conformations sampled during thermal unfolding.

Indexed as

Protein UnfoldingProteomeProteome

Identifiers

PMID24348236
PMCPMC3861036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.