Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348228›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Time scales in epigenetic dynamics and phenotypic heterogeneity of embryonic stem cells.

Masaki Sasai, Yudai Kawabata, Koh Makishi, Kazuhito Itoh, Tomoki P Terada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Theoretical and computational tools to model multistable gene regulatory networks.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trends in Symbiont-Induced Host Cellular Differentiation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Masaki SasaiDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan ; Department of Applied Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan ; School of Computational Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, Korea ; Okazaki Institute for Integrative Bioscience, Okazaki, Japan.
Yudai KawabataDepartment of Applied Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Koh MakishiDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuhito ItohDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoki P TeradaDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan ; Department of Applied Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPKorea Institute for Advanced Study · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A remarkable feature of the self-renewing population of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) is their phenotypic heterogeneity: Nanog and other marker proteins of ESCs show large cell-to-cell variation in their expression level, which should significantly influence the differentiation process of individual cells. The molecular mechanism and biological implication of this heterogeneity, however, still remain elusive. We address this problem by constructing a model of the core gene-network of mouse ESCs. The model takes account of processes of binding/unbinding of transcription factors, formation/dissolution of transcription apparatus, and modification of histone code at each locus of genes in the network. These processes are hierarchically interrelated to each other forming the dynamical feedback loops. By simulating stochastic dynamics of this model, we show that the phenotypic heterogeneity of ESCs can be explained when the chromatin at the Nanog locus undergoes the large scale reorganization in formation/dissolution of transcription apparatus, which should have the timescale similar to the cell cycle period. With this slow transcriptional switching of Nanog, the simulated ESCs fluctuate among multiple transient states, which can trigger the differentiation into the lineage-specific cell states. From the simulated transitions among cell states, the epigenetic landscape underlying transitions is calculated. The slow Nanog switching gives rise to the wide basin of ESC states in the landscape. The bimodal Nanog distribution arising from the kinetic flow running through this ESC basin prevents transdifferentiation and promotes the definite decision of the cell fate. These results show that the distribution of timescales of the regulatory processes is decisively important to characterize the fluctuation of cells and their differentiation process. The analyses through the epigenetic landscape and the kinetic flow on the landscape should provide a guideline to engineer cell differentiation.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Regulatory NetworksMicePhenotypeStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID24348228
PMCPMC3861442
OpenAlexW2139565489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.