ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Time scales in epigenetic dynamics and phenotypic heterogeneity of embryonic stem cells.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colony context and size-dependent compensation mechanisms give rise to variations in nuclear growth trajectories.Cell systems · 2025Article
- Irreversibility in bacterial regulatory networks.Science advances · 2024Article
- Uncovering underlying physical principles and driving forces of cell differentiation and reprogramming from single-cell transcriptomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Theoretical and computational tools to model multistable gene regulatory networks.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2023Review
- Insights into the cell fate decision-making processes from chromosome structural reorganizations.Biophysics reviews · 2022Article
- Deciphering the molecular mechanism of the cancer formation by chromosome structural dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A mathematical model exhibiting the effect of DNA methylation on the stability boundary in cell-fate networks.Epigenetics · 2021Article
- Decoding the mechanisms underlying cell-fate decision-making during stem cell differentiation by random circuit perturbation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Trends in Symbiont-Induced Host Cellular Differentiation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2020Article
- Quantifying the Stability of Coupled Genetic and Epigenetic Switches With Variational Methods.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Analysis of Single-Cell Gene Pair Coexpression Landscapes by Stochastic Kinetic Modeling Reveals Gene-Pair Interactions in Development.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Rare-event sampling of epigenetic landscapes and phenotype transitions.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Analysis of dynamically stable patterns in a maze-like corridor using the Wasserstein metric.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Nanog induced intermediate state in regulating stem cell differentiation and reprogramming.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- A stochastic and dynamical view of pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Network Features and Dynamical Landscape of Naive and Primed Pluripotency.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- A physical mechanism of cancer heterogeneity.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- BMP-SMAD Signaling Regulates Lineage Priming, but Is Dispensable for Self-Renewal in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.Stem cell reports · 2016Article
- Effects of Collective Histone State Dynamics on Epigenetic Landscape and Kinetics of Cell Reprogramming.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A remarkable feature of the self-renewing population of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) is their phenotypic heterogeneity: Nanog and other marker proteins of ESCs show large cell-to-cell variation in their expression level, which should significantly influence the differentiation process of individual cells. The molecular mechanism and biological implication of this heterogeneity, however, still remain elusive. We address this problem by constructing a model of the core gene-network of mouse ESCs. The model takes account of processes of binding/unbinding of transcription factors, formation/dissolution of transcription apparatus, and modification of histone code at each locus of genes in the network. These processes are hierarchically interrelated to each other forming the dynamical feedback loops. By simulating stochastic dynamics of this model, we show that the phenotypic heterogeneity of ESCs can be explained when the chromatin at the Nanog locus undergoes the large scale reorganization in formation/dissolution of transcription apparatus, which should have the timescale similar to the cell cycle period. With this slow transcriptional switching of Nanog, the simulated ESCs fluctuate among multiple transient states, which can trigger the differentiation into the lineage-specific cell states. From the simulated transitions among cell states, the epigenetic landscape underlying transitions is calculated. The slow Nanog switching gives rise to the wide basin of ESC states in the landscape. The bimodal Nanog distribution arising from the kinetic flow running through this ESC basin prevents transdifferentiation and promotes the definite decision of the cell fate. These results show that the distribution of timescales of the regulatory processes is decisively important to characterize the fluctuation of cells and their differentiation process. The analyses through the epigenetic landscape and the kinetic flow on the landscape should provide a guideline to engineer cell differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.