Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348226›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Metabolic constraint-based refinement of transcriptional regulatory networks.

Sriram Chandrasekaran, Nathan D Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sriram ChandrasekaranInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, United States of America ; Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
Nathan D PriceInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, United States of America ; Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

Identifying network pertubation using secreted protein profiles in glioblastomaR00CA126184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI PRICE, NATHAN D · 2009 to 2011
$747k
Identifying network pertubation using secreted protein profiles in glioblastomaK99CA126184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI PRICE, NATHAN D · 2008 to 2008
$142k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS CA 126184NCI NIH HHS K99 CA126184NCI NIH HHS R00 CA126184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a strong need for computational frameworks that integrate different biological processes and data-types to unravel cellular regulation. Current efforts to reconstruct transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) focus primarily on proximal data such as gene co-expression and transcription factor (TF) binding. While such approaches enable rapid reconstruction of TRNs, the overwhelming combinatorics of possible networks limits identification of mechanistic regulatory interactions. Utilizing growth phenotypes and systems-level constraints to inform regulatory network reconstruction is an unmet challenge. We present our approach Gene Expression and Metabolism Integrated for Network Inference (GEMINI) that links a compendium of candidate regulatory interactions with the metabolic network to predict their systems-level effect on growth phenotypes. We then compare predictions with experimental phenotype data to select phenotype-consistent regulatory interactions. GEMINI makes use of the observation that only a small fraction of regulatory network states are compatible with a viable metabolic network, and outputs a regulatory network that is simultaneously consistent with the input genome-scale metabolic network model, gene expression data, and TF knockout phenotypes. GEMINI preferentially recalls gold-standard interactions (p-value = 10(-172)), significantly better than using gene expression alone. We applied GEMINI to create an integrated metabolic-regulatory network model for Saccharomyces cerevisiae involving 25,000 regulatory interactions controlling 1597 metabolic reactions. The model quantitatively predicts TF knockout phenotypes in new conditions (p-value = 10(-14)) and revealed potential condition-specific regulatory mechanisms. Our results suggest that a metabolic constraint-based approach can be successfully used to help reconstruct TRNs from high-throughput data, and highlights the potential of using a biochemically-detailed mechanistic framework to integrate and reconcile inconsistencies across different data-types. The algorithm and associated data are available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/gemini-data/

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksMetabolismTranscription, GeneticPhenotypeYeasts

Identifiers

PMID24348226
PMCPMC3857774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.