Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24348055›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2013

Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology.

Stacey J Ackerman, David W Polly, Tyler Knight, Karen Schneider, Tim Holt, John Cummings

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03230279 (Randomized Controlled Trial Of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Compared To Radiofrequency Ablation For Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03230279 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial Of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Compared To Radiofrequency Ablation For Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

TypeinterventionalSponsorOchsner Health SystemRan2018 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsSacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction, Sacroiliac, SpondylitisArmsSacroiliac joint fusion, Sacroiliac joint radiofrequency ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence.International journal of spine surgery · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stacey J AckermanCovance Market Access Services Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
David W PollyUniversity of Minnesota, Orthopaedic Surgery, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Tyler KnightCovance Market Access Services Inc, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Karen SchneiderCovance Market Access Services Inc, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tim HoltMontgomery Spine Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Montgomery, AL, USA.
John CummingsCommunity Health Network, Neurosurgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Covance (United States) · USCommunity Health Network · USCovance (Australia) · AUMontgomery Botanical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe economic burden associated with the treatment of low back pain (LBP) in the United States is significant. LBP caused by sacroiliac (SI) joint disruption/degenerative sacroiliitis is most commonly treated with nonoperative care and/or open SI joint surgery. New and effective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) options may offer potential cost savings to Medicare.

methodsAn economic model was developed to compare the costs of MIS treatment to nonoperative care for the treatment of SI joint disruption in the hospital inpatient setting in the US Medicare population. Lifetime cost savings (2012 US dollars) were estimated from the published literature and claims data. Costs included treatment, follow-up, diagnostic testing, and retail pharmacy pain medication. Costs of SI joint disruption patients managed with nonoperative care were estimated from the 2005-2010 Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files using primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes 720.2, 724.6, 739.4, 846.9, or 847.3. MIS fusion hospitalization cost was based on Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) payments of $46,700 (with major complications - DRG 459) and $27,800 (without major complications - DRG 460), weighted assuming 3.8% of patients have complications. MIS fusion professional fee was determined from the 2012 Medicare payment for Current Procedural Terminology code 27280, with an 82% fusion success rate and 1.8% revision rate. Outcomes were discounted by 3.0% per annum.

resultsThe extrapolated lifetime cost of treating Medicare patients with MIS fusion was $48,185/patient compared to $51,543/patient for nonoperative care, resulting in a $660 million savings to Medicare (196,452 beneficiaries at $3,358 in savings/patient). Including those with ICD-9-CM code 721.3 (lumbosacral spondylosis) increased lifetime cost estimates (up to 478,764 beneficiaries at $8,692 in savings/patient).

conclusionTreating Medicare beneficiaries with MIS fusion in the hospital inpatient setting could save Medicare $660 million over patients' lifetimes.

Indexed as

costdegenerative sacroiliitisepidural injectioniFuseminimally invasive surgerysacroiliac joint disruption

Identifiers

PMID24348055
PMCPMC3838760
OpenAlexW4235620825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.