Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24347976›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics2013

Pharmacovigilance in Italy: An overview.

Carmela Mazzitello, Stefania Esposito, Adele E De Francesco, Annalisa Capuano, Emilio Russo, Giovambattista De Sarro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Patterns of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Safe Drugs Versus Innovative Drugs (Can We Have Both?).Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carmela MazzitelloDepartment of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, and Pharmacovigilance's Centre Calabria Region, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
Stefania EspositoDepartment of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, and Pharmacovigilance's Centre Calabria Region, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
Adele E De FrancescoPharmacy Unit, Mater Domini Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
Annalisa CapuanoRegional Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, and Department of Experimental Medicine "L. Donatelli", Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Emilio RussoDepartment of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, and Pharmacovigilance's Centre Calabria Region, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giovambattista De SarroDepartment of Science of Health, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, and Pharmacovigilance's Centre Calabria Region, University Hospital Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is the basis of pharmacovigilance. In fact, ADRs are associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. However, underreporting by all healthcare professionals remains the major problem in Italy and in the rest of the world. The dissemination of pharmacovigilance knowledge among Italian healthcare professionals, and the new pharmacovigilance regulations may promote the early detection and reporting of ADRs. This review examines the legislative framework concerning the pharmacovigilance in Italy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe information was collected from scientific articles and the websites of the Italian Ministry of Health and the Italian Medicines Agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, AIFA).

resultsThe pharmacovigilance system, both in Italy and Europe, has undergone profound changes. European legislation on pharmacovigilance has been changed in 2010 according to the EU Regulation 1235/2010 and Directive 2010/84/EU. Basically, the changes tend to increase the efficiency, speed and transparency of pharmacovigilance activities. The new Regulation (1235/2010) and the Directive (2010/84/EU) aim to strengthen the system of pharmacovigilance, establish more precisely who is obliged to do what, and allow faster and easier circulation and retrieval of information about ADRs.

conclusionA greater knowledge on what is the Italian pharmacovigilance legislation will be useful to improve the status of ADRs reporting and spread the culture of spontaneous reporting.

Indexed as

ADRsAIFAItalianlegislationmonitoring

Identifiers

PMID24347976
PMCPMC3853663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.