Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2015
Cost-effectiveness of an Internet-based treatment program for stress urinary incontinence.
Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Telehealth in the rehabilitation of female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic literature review.International urogynecology journal · 2021Pooled it
- Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies.International urogynecology journal · 2019Pooled it
- Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Use of a Mobile Application for Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Women With Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Control Trial.International urogynecology journal · 2024Trial
- One year effectiveness of an app-based treatment for urinary incontinence in comparison to care as usual in Dutch general practice: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 12 months.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of an app-based treatment for urinary incontinence in comparison with care-as-usual in Dutch general practice: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 12 months.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022Trial
- A mobile app for the treatment of female mixed and urgency incontinence: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Sweden.International urogynecology journal · 2022Trial
- Real-world effectiveness of app-based treatment for urinary incontinence: a cohort study.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- The Impact of Superfast Broadband, Tailored Booklets for Households, and Discussions With General Practitioners on Personal Electronic Health Readiness: Cluster Factorial Quasi-Randomized Control Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Trial
- Self-management of stress urinary incontinence via a mobile app: two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2017Trial
- Mobile App for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Trial
- Internet-based treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 1- and 2-year results of a randomized controlled trial with a focus on pelvic floor muscle training.BJU international · 2015Trial
- Physiotherapy in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Urology research & practice · 2023Article
- Digital Technologies for Women's Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Manage Urinary Incontinence Across Their Life Course: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Leveraging A Clinical Dashboard and Process Mappings to Improve Treatment Access and Outcomes for Women Veterans with Urinary Incontinence.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Mobile technologies for the conservative self-management of urinary incontinence: a systematic scoping review.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- A Mobile Application Penyikang Applied in Postpartum Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Study to Analyze the Factors Influencing Postpartum Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength and Women's Participation in Treatment.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- An Electronic Health Intervention for Dutch Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- Urinary incontinence in women.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo perform a deterministic cost-utility analysis, from a 1-year societal perspective, of two treatment programs for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) without face-to-face contact: one Internet-based and one sent by post. The treatments were compared with each other and with no treatment.
methodsWe performed this economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. The study included 250 women aged 18-70, with SUI ≥ 1 time/week, who were randomized to 3 months of pelvic floor muscle training via either an Internet-based program including e-mail support from an urotherapist (n = 124) or a program sent by post (n = 126). Recruitment was web-based, and participants were self-assessed with validated questionnaires and 2-day bladder diaries, supplemented by a telephone interview with a urotherapist. Treatment costs were continuously registered. Data on participants' time for training, incontinence aids, and laundry were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 1 year. We also measured quality of life with the condition-specific questionnaire ICIQ-LUTSqol, and calculated the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Baseline data remained unchanged for the no treatment option. Sensitivity analysis was performed.
resultsCompared to the postal program, the extra cost per QALY for the Internet-based program ranged from 200€ to 7,253€, indicating greater QALY-gains at similar or slightly higher costs. Compared to no treatment, the extra cost per QALY for the Internet-based program ranged from 10,022€ to 38,921€, indicating greater QALY-gains at higher, but probably acceptable costs.
conclusionAn Internet-based treatment for SUI is a new, cost-effective treatment alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.