Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24347032›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2014

[Patient-centredness in rehabilitation : an overview on the current state of research].

E Farin

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparing an in-person workshop and a postal Delphi survey for involving health service users in health care and health research prioritization.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Participation preferences of health service users in health care decision-making regarding rehabilitative care in Germany-A cross-sectional study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

E FarinInstitut für Qualitätsmanagement und Sozialmedizin (AQMS), Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 21, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland, erik.farin@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides an overall perspective of the concept of patient-centredness in health care. After discussing the social factors that significantly contribute to this topic, the authors refer to a definition by Mead and Bower in their understanding of patient-centredness. They distinguished five facets of patient-centredness, namely the biopsychosocial perspective, seeing the patient as an individual person, sharing power and responsibility (e.g. shared decision-making), consideration of the patient-treatment provider relationship and regarding the treatment provider as a person. The authors discuss why approaches employing patient-centred care seem particularly well-suited to a rehabilitation context and emphasize the value and benefit of patient-centred care. They describe those areas currently engaging the greatest research efforts in Germany by providing an overview of projects now being conducted in the funding priority for chronic illnesses and patient orientation. In the final chapter the authors consider the need for further research as well as the potential adverse side effects associated with intensified patient-centred care.

Indexed as

Patient PreferencePhysician-Patient RelationsBiomedical ResearchGermanyHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPersons with DisabilitiesRehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.