Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24346611›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2014

Use of health plan combined with registry data to predict clinical trial recruitment.

Jeffrey R Curtis, Nicole C Wright, Fenglong Xie, Lang Chen, Jie Zhang, Kenneth G Saag, Aseem Bharat, Joel Kremer, Stacey Cofield, Kevin Winthrop and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R CurtisaDivision of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Nicole C Wright
Fenglong Xie
Lang Chen
Jie Zhang
Kenneth G Saag
Aseem Bharat
Joel Kremer
Stacey Cofield
Kevin Winthrop
Elizabeth Delzell
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness & Safety of Biologics in AutoimmunityR01HS018517 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CURTIS, JEFFREY R. · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Fracture and Vascular DiseaseK23AR053351 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CURTIS, JEFFREY R. · 2007 to 2011
$755k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS018517AHRQ HHS R01HS018517NIAMS NIH HHS AR053351NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR053351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are increasingly used to conduct comparative effectiveness research. In the context of planning a safety PCT of the live herpes zoster vaccine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients aged ≥ 50 years receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy, we evaluated the use of health plan combined with registry data to assess the feasibility of recruiting the 4000 patients needed for the trial and to facilitate site selection.

methodsUsing national US data from Medicare, we identified older RA patients who received anti-TNF therapy in the last quarter of 2009. Extrapolations were made from the Medicare patient population to younger patients and those with other types of insurance using the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) disease registry. Patients' treating rheumatologists were grouped into practices and sorted by size from the greatest to the least number of eligible patients.

resultsApproximately 50,000 RA patients receiving anti-TNF therapy were identified in the Medicare data, distributed across 1980 physician practices. After augmenting Medicare data with information from CORRONA and extrapolating to younger patients and those with other types of insurance, more than 12,000 potentially eligible study subjects were identified from the 50 largest rheumatology practices.

conclusionHealth plan and registry databases appear useful to assess feasibility of large pragmatic trials and to assist in selection of recruitment sites with the greatest number of potentially eligible patients. This novel approach is applicable to trials with simple inclusion/exclusion criteria that can be readily assessed in these data sources.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMedicarePatient SelectionRegistriesAgedAged, 80 and overAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidComputer SimulationFeasibility StudiesHerpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineHumansMiddle AgedPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicUnited StatesAntirheumatic AgentsHerpes Zoster Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID24346611
PMCPMC4199104
OpenAlexW2067834255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.