Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24346496›Full record

ArticleHeredity2014

Disparate molecular evolution of two types of repetitive DNAs in the genome of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans.

M Teruel, F J Ruíz-Ruano, J A Marchal, A Sánchez, J Cabrero, J Pm Camacho, F Perfectti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Satellite DNA Is an Inseparable Fellow Traveler of B Chromosomes.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intragenomic distribution of RTE retroelements suggests intrachromosomal movement.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M TeruelDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
F J Ruíz-RuanoDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
J A MarchalDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
A SánchezDepartamento de Biología Experimental, Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
J CabreroDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
J Pm CamachoDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
F PerfecttiDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de Jaén · ESInstituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina "López - Neyra" · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wide arrays of repetitive DNA sequences form an important part of eukaryotic genomes. These repeats appear to evolve as coherent families, where repeats within a family are more similar to each other than to other orthologous representatives in related species. The continuous homogenization of repeats, through selective and non-selective processes, is termed concerted evolution. Ascertaining the level of variation between repeats is crucial to determining which evolutionary model best explains the homogenization observed for these sequences. Here, for the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans, we present the analysis of intragenomic diversity for two repetitive DNA sequences (a satellite DNA (satDNA) and the 45S rDNA) resulting from the independent microdissection of several chromosomes. Our results show different homogenization patterns for these two kinds of paralogous DNA sequences, with a high between-chromosome structure for rDNA but no structure at all for the satDNA. This difference is puzzling, considering the adjacent localization of the two repetitive DNAs on paracentromeric regions in most chromosomes. The disparate homogenization patterns detected for these two repetitive DNA sequences suggest that several processes participate in the concerted evolution in E. plorans, and that these mechanisms might not work as genome-wide processes but rather as sequence-specific ones.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBase CompositionBase SequenceDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerDNA, SatelliteFemaleGenetic VariationGenomeGrasshoppersHaplotypesMaleMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationPhylogenyDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerDNA, SatelliteRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S

Identifiers

PMID24346496
PMCPMC3998778
OpenAlexW2072351131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.