Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24346280›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2014

Effects of low-fat and high-fat meals on steady-state pharmacokinetics of lapatinib in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Lot A Devriese, Kevin M Koch, Marja Mergui-Roelvink, Gemma M Matthys, Wen Wee Ma, Andre Robidoux, Joe J Stephenson, Quincy S C Chu, Keith W Orford, Leanne Cartee and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 'The same old story': thoughts on authorized doses of anticancer drugs.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Phase I Study of an AKT Inhibitor (MK-2206) Combined with Lapatinib in Adult Solid Tumors Followed by Dose Expansion in Advanced HER2+ Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lot A DevrieseDivision of Experimental Therapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kevin M Koch
Marja Mergui-Roelvink
Gemma M Matthys
Wen Wee Ma
Andre Robidoux
Joe J Stephenson
Quincy S C Chu
Keith W Orford
Leanne Cartee
Jeff Botbyl
Nikita Arya
Jan H M Schellens
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAPrisma Health · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo quantify the effect of food on the systemic exposure of lapatinib at steady state when administered 1 h before and after meals, and to observe the safety and tolerability of lapatinib under these conditions in patients with advanced solid tumours.

methodsThis was a three-treatment, randomised, three-sequence cross-over study. Lapatinib was administered 1 h after a low- [B] or a high-fat [C] meal and systemic exposure was compared with that obtained following administration 1 h before a low-fat meal [A].

resultsIn total, 25 patients were included, of whom 12 were evaluable for the pharmacokinetic analysis. Both low-fat and high-fat meals affected lapatinib exposure. Lapatinib AUC0-24 increased following lapatinib administration 1 h after a low-fat meal by 1.80-fold (90 % CI: 1.37-2.37) and after a high-fat meal by 2.61-fold (90 % CI: 1.98-3.43). Lapatinib Cmax increased following lapatinib administration 1 h after a low-fat meal by 1.90-fold (90 % CI: 1.49-2.43) and after a high-fat meal by 2.66-fold (90 % CI: 2.08-3.41). The most commonly occurring treatment-related toxicity was diarrhoea (8/25, 32 % CTCAE grade 1 and 2/25, 8 % grade 2) and one treatment-related grade ≥ 3 event occurred (fatigue grade 3, 4 %).

conclusionsBoth low-fat and high-fat food consumed 1 h before lapatinib administration increased lapatinib systemic exposure compared with lapatinib administration 1 h before a low-fat meal. In order to administer lapatinib in a fasted state, it is advised to administer the drug 1 h before a meal.

Indexed as

Food-Drug InteractionsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCross-Over StudiesDietary FatsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHumansLapatinibMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesAntineoplastic AgentsDietary FatsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLapatinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID24346280
OpenAlexW2020555572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.