Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24346241›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

Volumetric CT-based segmentation of NSCLC using 3D-Slicer.

Emmanuel Rios Velazquez, Chintan Parmar, Mohammed Jermoumi, Raymond H Mak, Angela van Baardwijk, Fiona M Fennessy, John H Lewis, Dirk De Ruysscher, Ron Kikinis, Philippe Lambin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Value ofTechnology in cancer research & treatment
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Radiomics and Back Pain.Global spine journal · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Monitoring lung tumour volume on daily cone beam CT; is it achievable in a real-world setting?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Emmanuel Rios Velazquez1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA [2] Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands [3].
Chintan Parmar1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA [2] Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands [3].
Mohammed Jermoumi1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA [2] University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA.
Raymond H MakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Angela van BaardwijkDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Fiona M FennessyDepartment of Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John H LewisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Dirk De RuysscherRadiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ron KikinisDepartment of Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Hugo J W L Aerts1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA [2] Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USMaastro Clinic · NLBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USKU Leuven · BE

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON, WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Radiomics of NSCLCU01CA143062 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GILLIES, ROBERT J., SCHABATH, MATTHEW B. · 2010 to 2020
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA143062NCI NIH HHS U01 CA 143062-01NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate volumetric assessment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical for adequately informing treatments. In this study we assessed the clinical relevance of a semiautomatic computed tomography (CT)-based segmentation method using the competitive region-growing based algorithm, implemented in the free and public available 3D-Slicer software platform. We compared the 3D-Slicer segmented volumes by three independent observers, who segmented the primary tumour of 20 NSCLC patients twice, to manual slice-by-slice delineations of five physicians. Furthermore, we compared all tumour contours to the macroscopic diameter of the tumour in pathology, considered as the "gold standard". The 3D-Slicer segmented volumes demonstrated high agreement (overlap fractions > 0.90), lower volume variability (p = 0.0003) and smaller uncertainty areas (p = 0.0002), compared to manual slice-by-slice delineations. Furthermore, 3D-Slicer segmentations showed a strong correlation to pathology (r = 0.89, 95%CI, 0.81-0.94). Our results show that semiautomatic 3D-Slicer segmentations can be used for accurate contouring and are more stable than manual delineations. Therefore, 3D-Slicer can be employed as a starting point for treatment decisions or for high-throughput data mining research, such as Radiomics, where manual delineating often represent a time-consuming bottleneck.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCone-Beam Computed TomographyDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLungLung NeoplasmsPattern Recognition, AutomatedPositron-Emission TomographySoftwareBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24346241
PMCPMC3866632
OpenAlexW2143944233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.