Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24345173›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cognitive neuroscience2014

Dissociating motivation from reward in human striatal activity.

Eric M Miller, Maya U Shankar, Brian Knutson, Samuel M McClure

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How we decide what to eat: Toward an interdisciplinary model of gut-brain interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Avoiding monetary loss: A human habenula functional MRI ultra-high field study.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The basal ganglia and the cerebellum in human emotion.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric M MillerStanford University.
Maya U Shankar
Brian Knutson
Samuel M McClure

Funding

Developmental Changes in Neural Processes Underlying Inattention, Impulsivity and RegulationR01MH091068 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCHWEITZER, JULIE B. · 2012 to 2022
$7.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity in the striatum has consistently been shown to scale with the value of anticipated rewards. As a result, it is common across a number of neuroscientific subdiscliplines to associate activation in the striatum with anticipation of a rewarding outcome or a positive emotional state. However, most studies have failed to dissociate expected value from the motivation associated with seeking a reward. Although motivation generally scales positively with increases in potential reward, there are circumstances in which this linkage does not apply. The current study dissociates value-related activation from that induced by motivation alone by employing a task in which motivation increased as anticipated reward decreased. This design reverses the typical relationship between motivation and reward, allowing us to differentially investigate fMRI BOLD responses that scale with each. We report that activity scaled differently with value and motivation across the striatum. Specifically, responses in the caudate and putamen increased with motivation, whereas nucleus accumbens activity increased with expected reward. Consistent with this, self-report ratings indicated a positive association between caudate and putamen activity and arousal, whereas activity in the nucleus accumbens was more associated with liking. We conclude that there exist regional limits on inferring reward expectation from striatal activation.

Indexed as

RewardAdolescentAdultCorpus StriatumFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationPhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24345173
PMCPMC5808846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.