Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24345165›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cognitive neuroscience2014

Love to win or hate to Lose? Asymmetry of dopamine D2 receptor binding predicts sensitivity to reward versus punishment.

Rachel Tomer, Heleen A Slagter, Bradley T Christian, Andrew S Fox, Carlye R King, Dhanabalan Murali, Mark A Gluck, Richard J Davidson

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. D2 receptors and cognitive flexibility in marmosets: tri-phasic dose-response effects of intra-striatal quinpirole on serial reversal performance.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Left-shifting prism adaptation boosts reward-based learning.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Individual differences in dopamine DCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Altered reward expectancy in individuals with recent methamphetamine dependence.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Interoception, homeostatic emotions and sympathovagal balance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel TomerUniversity of Wisconsin.
Heleen A Slagter
Bradley T Christian
Andrew S Fox
Carlye R King
Dhanabalan Murali
Mark A Gluck
Richard J Davidson

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
STRESS EXPOSURE, HPA ACTIVITY AND RISK FOR ADOLESCENT INTERNALIZING DISORDERSP50MH084051 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOLDSMITH, HAROLD HILL · 2008 to 2012
$9.6M
Neural Substrates of Affective Style and Emotion RegulationR01MH043454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J, SCHAEFER, STACEY M · 1989 to 2022
$9.6M
Statistics and Data Management CoreP50NS071675 · NINDS · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI EIDELBERG, DAVID · 2010 to 2014
$9.3M
EMOTIONAL REACTIVITY AND ANTERIOR BRAIN ASYMMETRYR37MH043454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J · 1996 to 2005
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NICHD NIH HHS P30-HD003352NIMH NIH HHS MH43454NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH084051NIMH NIH HHS P50-MH084051NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH043454NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH043454NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS071675NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS071675-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans show consistent differences in the extent to which their behavior reflects a bias toward appetitive approach-related behavior or avoidance of aversive stimuli [Elliot, A. J. Approach and avoidance motivation. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 3-14). New York: Psychology Press, 2008]. We examined the hypothesis that in healthy participants this motivational bias (assessed by self-report and by a probabilistic learning task that allows direct comparison of the relative sensitivity to reward and punishment) reflects lateralization of dopamine signaling. Using [F-18]fallypride to measure D2/D3 binding, we found that self-reported motivational bias was predicted by the asymmetry of frontal D2 binding. Similarly, striatal and frontal asymmetries in D2 dopamine receptor binding, rather than absolute binding levels, predicted individual differences in learning from reward versus punishment. These results suggest that normal variation in asymmetry of dopamine signaling may, in part, underlie human personality and cognition.

Indexed as

HateLovePunishmentRewardAdultBrainFemaleForecastingHumansLearningMaleMotivationPhotic StimulationProtein BindingReceptors, Dopamine D2Young AdultDRD2 protein, humanReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID24345165
PMCPMC3972269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.