SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2013
Systematic review of clinical decision support interventions with potential for inpatient cost reduction.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07073898 (Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Systematic review of prognostic prediction models for acute kidney injury (AKI) in general hospital populations.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Precision diagnosis: a view of the clinical decision support systems (CDSS) landscape through the lens of critical care.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2017Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support to Improve CKD Outcomes Among First Nations Australians.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Development and Pilot Implementation of Neotree, a Digital Quality Improvement Tool Designed to Improve Newborn Care and Survival in 3 Hospitals in Malawi and Zimbabwe: Cost Analysis Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Effects of patients' hospital discharge preferences on uptake of clinical decision support.PloS one · 2021Article
- Clinical Decision Support May Link Multiple Domains to Improve Patient Care: Viewpoint.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Review
- A review of measurement practice in studies of clinical decision support systems 1998-2017.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Review
- Article
- The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support.Implementation science : IS · 2018Article
- Unintended adverse consequences of a clinical decision support system: two cases.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Participatory design of probability-based decision support tools for in-hospital nurses.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- Integrative review of clinical decision support for registered nurses in acute care settings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Review
- Design, Development, and Initial Evaluation of a Terminology for Clinical Decision Support and Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare costs are increasing rapidly and at an unsustainable rate in many countries, and inpatient hospitalizations are a significant driver of these costs. Clinical decision support (CDS) represents a promising approach to not only improve care but to reduce costs in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to systematically review trials of CDS interventions with the potential to reduce inpatient costs, so as to identify promising interventions for more widespread implementation and to inform future research in this area.
methodsTo identify relevant studies, MEDLINE was searched up to July 2013. CDS intervention studies with the potential to reduce inpatient healthcare costs were identified through titles and abstracts, and full text articles were reviewed to make a final determination on inclusion. Relevant characteristics of the studies were extracted and summarized.
resultsFollowing a screening of 7,663 articles, 78 manuscripts were included. 78.2% of studies were controlled before-after studies, and 15.4% were randomized controlled trials. 53.8% of the studies were focused on pharmacotherapy. The majority of manuscripts were published during or after 2008. 70.5% of the studies resulted in statistically and clinically significant improvements in an explicit financial measure or a proxy financial measure. Only 12.8% of the studies directly measured the financial impact of an intervention, whereas the financial impact was inferred in the remainder of studies. Data on cost effectiveness was available for only one study.
conclusionsSignificantly more research is required on the impact of clinical decision support on inpatient costs. In particular, there is a remarkable gap in the availability of cost effectiveness studies required by policy makers and decision makers in healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.