Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24344307›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Quantitation of the DNA tethering effect in long-range DNA looping in vivo and in vitro using the Lac and λ repressors.

David G Priest, Lun Cui, Sandip Kumar, David D Dunlap, Ian B Dodd, Keith E Shearwin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 3D Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/dCas Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Detecting DNA Loops Using Tethered Particle Motion.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Robustness of DNA looping across multiple cell divisions in individual bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Energetics of twisted DNA topologies.Biophysical journal · 2021
    Review
  10. Engineering 3D genome organization.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Proteins mediating DNA loops effectively block transcription.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David G PriestDiscipline of Biochemistry, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Lun Cui
Sandip Kumar
David D Dunlap
Ian B Dodd
Keith E Shearwin
University of Adelaide · AUEmory University · US

Funding

The lambda bacteriophage regulatory loopR01GM084070 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FINZI, LAURA · 2009 to 2021
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084070PHS HHS RGM084070A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient and specific interactions between proteins bound to the same DNA molecule can be dependent on the length of the DNA tether that connects them. Measurement of the strength of this DNA tethering effect has been largely confined to short separations between sites, and it is not clear how it contributes to long-range DNA looping interactions, such as occur over separations of tens to hundreds of kilobase pairs in vivo. Here, gene regulation experiments using the LacI and λ CI repressors, combined with mathematical modeling, were used to quantitate DNA tethering inside Escherichia coli cells over the 250- to 10,000-bp range. Although LacI and CI loop DNA in distinct ways, measurements of the tethering effect were very similar for both proteins. Tethering strength decreased with increasing separation, but even at 5- to 10-kb distances, was able to increase contact probability 10- to 20-fold and drive efficient looping. Tethering in vitro with the Lac repressor was measured for the same 600-to 3,200-bp DNAs using tethered particle motion, a single molecule technique, and was 5- to 45-fold weaker than in vivo over this range. Thus, the enhancement of looping seen previously in vivo at separations below 500 bp extends to large separations, underlining the need to understand how in vivo factors aid DNA looping. Our analysis also suggests how efficient and specific looping could be achieved over very long DNA separations, such as what occurs between enhancers and promoters in eukaryotic cells.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA, BacterialEnhancer Elements, GeneticEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGenes, ReporterLac OperonLac RepressorsModels, TheoreticalPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Interaction MappingRepressor ProteinsThermodynamicsTime FactorsViral Regulatory and Accessory ProteinsDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsLac Repressorsphage repressor proteinsRepressor ProteinsViral Regulatory and Accessory Proteinsj factorpromoter-enhancerTPM

Identifiers

PMID24344307
PMCPMC3890862
OpenAlexW2159882496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.