Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24344210›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2014

Autologous or reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive mantle-cell lymphoma: analysis of transplantation timing and modality.

Timothy S Fenske, Mei-Jie Zhang, Jeanette Carreras, Ernesto Ayala, Linda J Burns, Amanda Cashen, Luciano J Costa, César O Freytes, Robert P Gale, Mehdi Hamadani and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. What is the role of up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy S FenskeTimothy S. Fenske and Mehdi Hamadani, Medical College of Wisconsin; Mei-Jie Zhang, Jeanette Carreras, and Parameswaran N. Hari, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Ernesto Ayala, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; Baldeep M. Wirk, Shands Healthcare and University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Linda J. Burns, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview, Minneapolis; David J. Inwards, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Amanda Cashen, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Luciano J. Costa, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; César O. Freytes, South Texas Veterans Health Care System and University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Robert P. Gale, Imperial College; Silvia Montoto, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; Leona A. Holmberg and David G. Maloney, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Hillard M. Lazarus, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Richard T. Maziarz, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; Reinhold Munker, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Miguel-Angel Perales, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; David A. Rizzieri, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Harry C. Schouten, Academische Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Sonali M. Smith, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL; Edmund K. Waller, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA; and Ginna G. Laport, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA.
Mei-Jie Zhang
Jeanette Carreras
Ernesto Ayala
Linda J Burns
Amanda Cashen
Luciano J Costa
César O Freytes
Robert P Gale
Mehdi Hamadani
Leona A Holmberg
David J Inwards
Hillard M Lazarus
Richard T Maziarz
Reinhold Munker
Miguel-Angel Perales
David A Rizzieri
Harry C Schouten
Sonali M Smith
Edmund K Waller
Baldeep M Wirk
Ginna G Laport
David G Maloney
Silvia Montoto
Parameswaran N Hari
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
PB vs. BMU01HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2001 to 2010
$63.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24-CA76518NHLBI NIH HHS 5U01HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069294PHS HHS HHSH234200637015C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the outcomes of patients with chemotherapy-sensitive mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) following a first hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT), comparing outcomes with autologous (auto) versus reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic (RIC allo) HCT and with transplantation applied at different times in the disease course. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn all, 519 patients who received transplantations between 1996 and 2007 and were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research were analyzed. The early transplantation cohort was defined as those patients in first partial or complete remission with no more than two lines of chemotherapy. The late transplantation cohort was defined as all the remaining patients.

resultsAuto-HCT and RIC allo-HCT resulted in similar overall survival from transplantation for both the early (at 5 years: 61% auto-HCT v 62% RIC allo-HCT; P = .951) and late cohorts (at 5 years: 44% auto-HCT v 31% RIC allo-HCT; P = .202). In both early and late transplantation cohorts, progression/relapse was lower and nonrelapse mortality was higher in the allo-HCT group. Overall survival and progression-free survival were highest in patients who underwent auto-HCT in first complete response. Multivariate analysis of survival from diagnosis identified a survival benefit favoring early HCT for both auto-HCT and RIC allo-HCT.

conclusionFor patients with chemotherapy-sensitive MCL, the optimal timing for HCT is early in the disease course. Outcomes are particularly favorable for patients undergoing auto-HCT in first complete remission. For those unable to achieve complete remission after two lines of chemotherapy or those with relapsed disease, either auto-HCT or RIC allo-HCT may be effective, although the chance for long-term remission and survival is lower.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphoma, Mantle-CellMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTime FactorsTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation Conditioning

Identifiers

PMID24344210
PMCPMC3897255
OpenAlexW2105352757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.