Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24344144›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2014

Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise.

Holger J Schünemann, Wojtek Wiercioch, Itziar Etxeandia, Maicon Falavigna, Nancy Santesso, Reem Mustafa, Matthew Ventresca, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Kaja-Triin Laisaar, Sérgio Kowalski and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 347 papers, 47 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
347citing papers in PubMed, 47 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

347 citing papers in PubMed, 47 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Best practice recommendations for the clinical care of spinal bulbar muscular atrophy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  14. Guideline
  15. Recommendations on interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in adults in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  16. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  17. Guideline
  18. Guideline
  19. Guideline
  20. Pooled it

287 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Holger J Schünemann
Wojtek Wiercioch
Itziar Etxeandia
Maicon Falavigna
Nancy Santesso
Reem Mustafa
Matthew Ventresca
Romina Brignardello-Petersen
Kaja-Triin Laisaar
Sérgio Kowalski
Tejan Baldeh
Yuan Zhang
Ulla Raid
Ignacio Neumann
Susan L Norris
Judith Thornton
Robin Harbour
Shaun Treweek
Gordon Guyatt
Pablo Alonso-Coello
Marge Reinap
Jan Brozek
Andrew Oxman
Elie A Akl

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several tools to evaluate the credibility of health care guidelines exist, guidance on practical steps for developing guidelines is lacking. We systematically compiled a comprehensive checklist of items linked to relevant resources and tools that guideline developers could consider, without the expectation that every guideline would address each item.

methodsWe searched data sources, including manuals of international guideline developers, literature on guidelines for guidelines (with a focus on methodology reports from international and national agencies, and professional societies) and recent articles providing systematic guidance. We reviewed these sources in duplicate, extracted items for the checklist using a sensitive approach and developed overarching topics relevant to guidelines. In an iterative process, we reviewed items for duplication and omissions and involved experts in guideline development for revisions and suggestions for items to be added.

resultsWe developed a checklist with 18 topics and 146 items and a webpage to facilitate its use by guideline developers. The topics and included items cover all stages of the guideline enterprise, from the planning and formulation of guidelines, to their implementation and evaluation. The final checklist includes links to training materials as well as resources with suggested methodology for applying the items.

interpretationThe checklist will serve as a resource for guideline developers. Consideration of items on the checklist will support the development, implementation and evaluation of guidelines. We will use crowdsourcing to revise the checklist and keep it up to date.

Indexed as

ChecklistData CollectionEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID24344144
PMCPMC3928232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.