Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24343889›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2015

Primary visual cortex represents the difference between past and present.

Nora Nortmann, Sascha Rekauzke, Selim Onat, Peter König, Dirk Jancke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. TMS-induced neuronal plasticity enables targeted remodeling of visual cortical maps.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Temporal Asymmetry in Dark-Bright Processing Initiates Propagating Activity across Primary Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nora NortmannOptical Imaging Group, Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany Bernstein Group for Computational Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, 49069 Osnabrück, Germany.
Sascha RekauzkeOptical Imaging Group, Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany Bernstein Group for Computational Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany.
Selim OnatInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, 49069 Osnabrück, Germany.
Peter KönigInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, 49069 Osnabrück, Germany Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk JanckeOptical Imaging Group, Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany Bernstein Group for Computational Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual system is confronted with rapidly changing stimuli in everyday life. It is not well understood how information in such a stream of input is updated within the brain. We performed voltage-sensitive dye imaging across the primary visual cortex (V1) to capture responses to sequences of natural scene contours. We presented vertically and horizontally filtered natural images, and their superpositions, at 10 or 33 Hz. At low frequency, the encoding was found to represent not the currently presented images, but differences in orientation between consecutive images. This was in sharp contrast to more rapid sequences for which we found an ongoing representation of current input, consistent with earlier studies. Our finding that for slower image sequences, V1 does no longer report actual features but represents their relative difference in time counteracts the view that the first cortical processing stage must always transfer complete information. Instead, we show its capacities for change detection with a new emphasis on the role of automatic computation evolving in the 100-ms range, inevitably affecting information transmission further downstream.

Indexed as

Brain MappingChi-Square DistributionEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMaleOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationPsychophysicsTime FactorsVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVoltage-Sensitive Dye Imagingearly visual cortexinformation transmissionnatural image processingorientation difference detectionpredictive coding

Identifiers

PMID24343889
PMCPMC4428292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.