Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24343307›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2014

Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma.

Patrick Roth, Roger Stupp, Günter Eisele, Michael Weller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick RothDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland, patrick.roth@usz.ch.
Roger Stupp
Günter Eisele
Michael Weller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPrimary central nervous system lymphoma is a particular challenge in clinical neuro-oncology. In contrast to most other malignant brain tumors, it may be considered a curable disease at least in younger patients who can tolerate intensive treatment regimens. Yet, therapeutic progress has been limited with little measurable improvement in outcome over the last two decades, mainly due to the low incidence of this tumor, which impedes the execution of large randomized clinical trials, and the failure of most large cooperative groups to conduct such trials. Whenever possible, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is the backbone of the therapeutic regimen. Response rates can be increased by the addition of second agents like ifosfamide or cytarabine, however, their impact on overall survival is less clear. Similarly, the use of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, commonly used in the treatment of B cell lymphomas outside the CNS, remains controversial and has not been examined in adequate clinical trials. The prognosis of patients, who do not qualify for HD-MTX-based chemotherapy, is considerably poorer. Radiation therapy is an active treatment with high response rates but does typically not result in long-lasting remissions. It remains an important therapeutic option as a salvage therapy in patients progressing on or no longer responding to HD-MTX-based treatment. The combination of HD-MTX and radiation therapy does not prolong overall survival. It is associated with significant neurotoxicity, and it should be avoided. Another matter of debate is whether consolidation therapy by other means, such as high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell support, is the most promising regimen. Given these numerous uncertainties, neuro-oncologists should strive for a treatment of PCNSL patients within clinical trials to allow for the development of improved therapeutic regimens.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.