ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2014
Prognostic value of EEG indexes for the Glasgow outcome scale of comatose patients in the acute phase.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twenty-four-hour rhythmicities in disorders of consciousness are associated with a favourable outcome.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Research on Recurrence Plot Feature Quantization Method Based on Image Texture Analysis.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Estimation of Complexity of Sampled Biomedical Continuous Time Signals Using Approximate Entropy.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Long-Term (Six Years) Clinical Outcome Discrimination of Patients in the Vegetative State Could be Achieved Based on the Operational Architectonics EEG Analysis: A Pilot Feasibility Study.The open neuroimaging journal · 2016Article
- Chaos in balance: non-linear measures of postural control predict individual variations in visual illusions of motion.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this work is the estimation of the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) from a single continuous electroencephalogram (c-EEG) routinely recorded to monitor comatose patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. c-EEG was recorded from 13 patients in the acute phase: five with GOS = 5, four with GOS = 3 and four with GOS = 1. Different indexes were extracted from epochs of c-EEG (classical: amplitude and spectral estimators; non classical: from recurrence quantification analysis-RQA-and approximate entropy). Descriptors of different indexes (temporal variation and mean, standard deviation, skewness of the distribution across epochs) were used to train support vector machines to identify the correct GOS. We found classifiers allowing correct classification of the patients. Spectral indexes allowed to get optimal performances in classifying GOS 1 and 3. Nonlinear indexes (especially determinism from RQA) were optimal for identifying GOS = 5. Thus, the integration of information from classical/linear and nonlinear c-EEG descriptors in a multi-index classifier is important for GOS estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24343155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.