Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24340313›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie2013

Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video.

Sateesh Reddy Prakash, Siddharth Verma, John McGowan, Betsy E Smith, Anjali Shroff, Gregory H Gibson, Michael Cheng, Douglas Lowe Ii, Kavitha Gopal, Smruti R Mohanty

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02303743 (Improving the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Using a Smart Phone Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02303743 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Improving the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Using a Smart Phone Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorVicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga GarcíaRan2014 to 2014Enrolled260ConditionsCathartics, Mobile ApplicationsArmsSmart Phone Application, Written instructions with visual aids
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Harnessing Digital Videos to Promote Cancer Prevention and Education: a Systematic Review of the Literature from 2013-2018.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bowel cleansing efficacy of 1 L NER1006JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Increased quality of bowel preparation via smartphone WeChat application: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sateesh Reddy Prakash
Siddharth Verma
John McGowan
Betsy E Smith
Anjali Shroff
Gregory H Gibson
Michael Cheng
Douglas Lowe Ii
Kavitha Gopal
Smruti R Mohanty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy is the preferred modality for colon cancer screening. A successful colonoscopy requires proper bowel preparation. Adequate bowel preparation continues to remain a limiting factor. One hundred thirty-three patients scheduled for an outpatient colonoscopy were prospectively randomized in a single-blinded manner to video or nonvideo group. In addition to written bowel preparation instructions, patients in the video group viewed a brief instructional video. Quality of colon preparation was measured using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Quality scale, while patient satisfaction with preparation was evaluated using a questionnaire. Statistical analyses were used to evaluate the impact of the instructional colonoscopy video. There were significant differences in the quality of colonoscopy preparation between the video and the nonvideo groups. Participants who watched the video had better preparation scores in the right colon (P=0.0029), mid-colon (P=0.0027), rectosigmoid (P=0.0008), fluid content (P=0.03) and aggregate score (median score 4 versus 5; P=0.0002). There was no difference between the two groups with regard to patient satisfaction. Income, education level, sex, age and family history of colon cancer had no impact on quality of colonoscopy preparation or patient satisfaction. The addition of an instructional bowel preparation video significantly improved the quality of colon preparation.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionVideo RecordingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCatharticsColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultCathartics

Identifiers

PMID24340313
PMCPMC3915011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.