ReviewClinical endoscopy2013
Endoscopic molecular imaging: status and future perspective.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lightweight deep learning model incorporating an attention mechanism and feature fusion for automatic classification of gastric lesions in gastroscopic images.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Bioinspired color-near infrared endoscopic imaging system for molecular guided cancer surgery.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Article
- Dendrimers for cancer immunotherapy: Avidity-based drug delivery vehicles for effective anti-tumor immune response.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Hierarchically Multivalent Peptide-Nanoparticle Architectures: A Systematic Approach to Engineer Surface Adhesion.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Algorithm combining virtual chromoendoscopy features for colorectal polyp classification.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Screening and identification of a CD44v6 specific peptide using improved phage display for gastric cancer targeting.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- The Status of Advanced Imaging Techniques for Optical Biopsy of Colonic Polyps.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2020Review
- In vivo biodistribution and toxicity of intravesical administration of quantum dots for optical molecular imaging of bladder cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A Clinical Wide-Field Fluorescence Endoscopic Device for Molecular Imaging Demonstrating Cathepsin Protease Activity in Colon Cancer.Molecular imaging and biology · 2016Article
- A new non-muscle-invasive bladder tumor-homing peptide identified by phage display in vivo.Oncology reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the last decade, researchers have made great progress in the development of new image processing technologies for gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, diagnosis using conventional endoscopy with white light optical imaging is essentially limited, and ultimately, we still rely on the histopathological diagnosis from biopsy specimens. Molecular imaging represents the most novel imaging methods in medicine, and the future of endoscopic diagnosis is likely to be impacted by a combination of biomarkers and technology. Endoscopic molecular imaging can be defined as the visualization of molecular characteristics with endoscopy. These innovations will allow us not only to locate a tumor or dysplastic lesion but also to visualize its molecular characteristics and the activity of specific molecules and biological processes that affect tumor behavior and/or its response to therapy. In the near future, these promising technologies will play a central role in endoluminal oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.