ArticleEcology and evolution2013
High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Pooled it
- Two Secondary Introductions From a Shared Bridgehead Population Show Evidence of Divergent and Parallel Selection.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Genomic Footprints of Selfing, Introduction History, and Long-Distance Dispersal in an Invasive Alien Plant.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Thermal Plasticity is Regulated by a Key MicroRNA During Range Expansion of an Invasive Fruit Fly.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Genotypic diversity alters invasive ability ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Rapid morphological change in UK populations of Impatiens glandulifera.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Serial founder effects slow range expansion in an invasive social insect.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The Mediterranean MusselAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Whole-mitogenome analysis unveils previously undescribed genetic diversity in cane toads across their invasion trajectory.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Recent beak evolution in North American starlings after invasion.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The General Trends of Genetic Diversity Change in Alien Plants' Invasion.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Origin and genetic variability of populations of the invasive plantEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Complex patterns shape immune genes diversity during invasion of common raccoon in Europe - Selection in action despite genetic drift.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Weedy and seedy: the rapid evolution of life-history characteristics in an introduced daisy.AoB PLANTS · 2022Article
- Brain transcriptome analysis reveals gene expression differences associated with dispersal behaviour between range-front and range-core populations of invasive cane toads in Australia.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- Contrasting mitochondrial diversity of European starlings (Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Evolution of defense and herbivory in introduced plants-Testing enemy release using a known source population, herbivore trials, and time since introduction.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Competitive Displacement betweenInsects · 2019Article
- Rapid evolution of leaf physiology in an introduced beach daisy.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Development of microsatellite markers and the genetic diversity of Myocastor coypus introduced to South Korea.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some introduced populations thrive and evolve despite the presumed loss of diversity at introduction. We aimed to quantify the amount of genetic diversity retained at introduction in species that have shown evidence of adaptation to their introduced environments. Samples were taken from native and introduced ranges of Arctotheca populifolia and Petrorhagia nanteuilii. Using microsatellite data, we identified the source for each introduction, estimated genetic diversity in native and introduced populations, and calculated the amount of diversity retained in introduced populations. These values were compared to those from a literature review of diversity in native, confamilial populations and to estimates of genetic diversity retained at introduction. Gene diversity in the native range of both species was significantly lower than for confamilials. We found that, on average, introduced populations showing evidence of adaptation to their new environments retained 81% of the genetic diversity from the native range. Introduced populations of P. nanteuilii had higher genetic diversity than found in the native source populations, whereas introduced populations of A. populifolia retained only 14% of its native diversity in one introduction and 1% in another. Our literature review has shown that most introductions demonstrating adaptive ability have lost diversity upon introduction. The two species studied here had exceptionally low native range genetic diversity. Further, the two introductions of A. populifolia represent the largest percentage loss of genetic diversity in a species showing evidence of substantial morphological change in the introduced range. While high genetic diversity may increase the likelihood of invasion success, the species examined here adapted to their new environments with very little neutral genetic diversity. This finding suggests that even introductions founded by small numbers of individuals have the potential to become invasive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.