Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24339865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Inferring the rate-length law of protein folding.

Thomas J Lane, Vijay S Pande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cotranslational folding allows misfolding-prone proteins to circumvent deep kinetic traps.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Role of Proteome Physical Chemistry in Cell Behavior.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016
    Review
  5. Protein unfolding rates correlate as strongly as folding rates with native structure.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015
    Article
  6. General mechanism of two-state protein folding kinetics.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas J LaneDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Vijay S Pande

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the rate-length scaling law of protein folding, a key undetermined scaling law in the analytical theory of protein folding. Available data yield statistically significant evidence for the existence of a rate-length law capable of predicting folding times to within about two orders of magnitude (over 9 decades of variation). Unambiguous determination of the functional form of such a law could provide key mechanistic insight into folding. Four proposed laws from literature (power law, exponential, and two stretched exponentials) are tested against one another, and it is found that the power law best explains the data by a modest margin. We conclude that more data is necessary to unequivocally infer the rate-length law. Such data could be obtained through a small number of protein folding experiments on large protein domains.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein FoldingKineticsLikelihood FunctionsProtein Structure, Tertiary

Identifiers

PMID24339865
PMCPMC3855161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.