Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24339764›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Understanding variation in transcription factor binding by modeling transcription factor genome-epigenome interactions.

Chieh-Chun Chen, Shu Xiao, Dan Xie, Xiaoyi Cao, Chun-Xiao Song, Ting Wang, Chuan He, Sheng Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ten Years of EWAS.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chieh-Chun ChenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Shu Xiao
Dan Xie
Xiaoyi Cao
Chun-Xiao Song
Ting Wang
Chuan He
Sheng Zhong

Funding

Evolutionary models for gene regulatory networksDP2OD007417 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ZHONG, SHENG · 2010 to 2010
$2.3M
ADVANCED EPI/GENOME BROWSER WITH ENHANCED VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS TOOLSR01HG007354 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007354NIH HHS DP2 OD007417NIH HHS DP2-OD007417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite explosive growth in genomic datasets, the methods for studying epigenomic mechanisms of gene regulation remain primitive. Here we present a model-based approach to systematically analyze the epigenomic functions in modulating transcription factor-DNA binding. Based on the first principles of statistical mechanics, this model considers the interactions between epigenomic modifications and a cis-regulatory module, which contains multiple binding sites arranged in any configurations. We compiled a comprehensive epigenomic dataset in mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells, including DNA methylation (MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq), DNA hydroxymethylation (5-hmC-seq), and histone modifications (ChIP-seq). We discovered correlations of transcription factors (TFs) for specific combinations of epigenomic modifications, which we term epigenomic motifs. Epigenomic motifs explained why some TFs appeared to have different DNA binding motifs derived from in vivo (ChIP-seq) and in vitro experiments. Theoretical analyses suggested that the epigenome can modulate transcriptional noise and boost the cooperativity of weak TF binding sites. ChIP-seq data suggested that epigenomic boost of binding affinities in weak TF binding sites can function in mES cells. We showed in theory that the epigenome should suppress the TF binding differences on SNP-containing binding sites in two people. Using personal data, we identified strong associations between H3K4me2/H3K9ac and the degree of personal differences in NFκB binding in SNP-containing binding sites, which may explain why some SNPs introduce much smaller personal variations on TF binding than other SNPs. In summary, this model presents a powerful approach to analyze the functions of epigenomic modifications. This model was implemented into an open source program APEG (Affinity Prediction by Epigenome and Genome, http://systemsbio.ucsd.edu/apeg).

Indexed as

EpigenomicsGenomeModels, Biological5-MethylcytosineAnimalsCytosineDNAEmbryonic Stem CellsHistonesMiceProtein BindingTranscription Factors5-hydroxymethylcytosine5-MethylcytosineCytosineDNAHistonesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24339764
PMCPMC3854512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.