Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24339491›Full record

ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society2013

Role of DR-70 immunoassay in suspected malignant pleural effusion.

Amitabha Sengupta, Kaushik Saha, Debraj Jash, Sourindra Nath Banerjee, Nirendra Mohan Biswas, Atin Dey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DR-70 immunoassay and malignant pleural effusion.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2014
    Article
  3. Authors' reply.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amitabha SenguptaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, NRS Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Kaushik Saha
Debraj Jash
Sourindra Nath Banerjee
Nirendra Mohan Biswas
Atin Dey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextA good proportion of patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion (PE) turn into malignancy over a period of time. Identification of positive biomarker may help in selecting the individuals who require close follow-up.

aimsThe aims of this study were to evaluate the role of DR-70 immunoassay in suspected malignant PE. SETTINGS AND

designWe conducted a cross-sectional study among 89 patients of suspected malignant PE and 50 normal subjects (NS) were taken as control. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with exudative PE; who had pleural fluid lymphocyte count greater than 50% and adenosine deaminase less than 30 U/L were taken as cases. We had selected NSs among relatives of patients having normal blood chemistry and radiological investigations. Sensitivity and specificity of the test to differentiate malignant and non-malignant PE and also to identify PE with underlying malignancy was analyzed.

resultsMean value of DR-70 in NS was found to be 0.83 ± 0.273 mg/L without any significant difference between males (0.82 mg/L) and females (0.85 mg/L). Mean value of DR-70 in PE with underlying cancer was 5.03 ± 3.79 mg/L. Sensitivity (80%) and specificity (77.78%) of the test was maximum in PE with underlying cancer using cut-off value of 2 mg/L. Mean value DR-70 in malignant PE was 5.18 ± 3.75 mg/L and in non-malignant PE was 3.73 ± 3.74 mg/L without any statistically significant difference (P = 0.08).

conclusionsDR-70 assay has high sensitivity in detecting underlying lung cancer, but has no role in differentiating malignant PE from non-malignant PE.

Indexed as

Bronchogenic carcinomaDR-70 immunoassaypleural effusionsensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID24339491
PMCPMC3841690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.