Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24338594›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2014

Comparative gene expression signature of pig, human and mouse induced pluripotent stem cell lines reveals insight into pig pluripotency gene networks.

Yajun Liu, Yangyang Ma, Jeong-Yeh Yang, De Cheng, Xiaopeng Liu, Xiaoling Ma, Franklin D West, Huayan Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cells · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Induced pluripotent stem cells from farm animals.Journal of animal science · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genome-wide profiling of Sus scrofa circular RNAs across nine organs and three developmental stages.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yajun LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Shaanxi Center for Stem Cell Engineering and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Yangyang Ma
Jeong-Yeh Yang
De Cheng
Xiaopeng Liu
Xiaoling Ma
Franklin D West
Huayan Wang
Northwest A&F University · CNUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reported pig induced pluripotent stem cells (piPSCs) have shown either a bFGF-dependent state with human embryonic stem cell (ESC) and mouse epiblast stem cell (EpiSC) morphology and molecular features or piPSCs exist in a LIF-dependent state and resemble fully reprogrammed mouse iPSCs. The features of authentic piPSCs and molecular events during the reprogramming are largely unknown. In this study, we assessed the transcriptome profile of multiple piPSC lines derived from different laboratories worldwide and compared to mouse and human iPSCs to determine the molecular signaling pathways that might play a central role in authentic piPSCs. The results demonstrated that the up-regulation of endogenous epithelial cells adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was correlated with the pluripotent state of pig pluripotent cells, which could be utilized as a marker for evaluating pig cell reprogramming. Comparison of key signaling pathways JAK-STAT, NOTCH, TGFB1, WNT and VEGF in pig, mouse and human iPSCs showed that the core transcriptional network to maintain pluripotency and self-renewal in pig were different from that in mouse, but had significant similarities to human. Pig iPSCs, which lacked expression of specific naïve state markers KLF2/4/5 and TBX3, but expressed the primed state markers of Otx2 and Fabp7, share defining features with human ESCs and mouse EpiSCs. The cluster of imprinted genes delineated by the delta-like homolog 1 gene and the type III iodothyronine deiodinase gene (DLK1-DIO3) were silenced in piPSCs as previously seen in mouse iPSCs that have limited ability to contribute to chimaeras. These key differences in naïve state gene and imprinting gene expression suggests that so far known piPSC lines may be more similar to primed state cells. The primed state of these cells may potentially explain the rare ability of piPSCS to generate chimeras and cloned offspring.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBiomarkersCell LineCell ShapeEmbryonic Stem CellsGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene SilencingGenomic ImprintingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOocytesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24338594
OpenAlexW2129484410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.