Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24338440›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2014

Orexigenic response to tail pinch: role of brain NPY(1) and corticotropin releasing factor receptors.

Miriam Goebel-Stengel, Andreas Stengel, Lixin Wang, Yvette Taché

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Central somatostatin signaling and regulation of food intake.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Chronic and acute effects of stress on energy balance: are there appropriate animal models?American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam Goebel-StengelCURE Digestive Diseases Research Center, Center for Neurobiology of Stress, Digestive Diseases Division, Department of Medicine, at University of California Los Angeles and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California;
Andreas Stengel
Lixin Wang
Yvette Taché
University of California, Los Angeles · USMartin-Luther-Krankenhaus · DEVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK041301 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROZENGURT, JUAN ENRIQUE · 1990 to 2019
$18.0M
CORTICOTROPIN-RELEASING FACTOR--BIOLOGICAL ACTIONR01DK033061 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TACHE, YVETTE FRANCE · 1986 to 2012
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK-41301NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK041301NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK-33061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tail pinch stimulates food intake in rats. We investigated brain mechanisms of this response and the influence of repeated exposure. Sprague-Dawley rats received acute (5 min) or repeated (5 min/day for 14 days) tail pinch using a padded clip. Acute tail pinch increased 5-min food intake compared with control (0.92 ± 0.2 vs. 0.03 ± 0.01 g, P < 0.01). This response was inhibited by 76% by intracerebroventricular injection of BIBP-3226, a neuropeptide Y1 (NPY1) receptor antagonist, increased by 48% by astressin-B, a corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonist, and not modified by S-406-028, a somatostatin subtype 2 antagonist. After the 5-min tail pinch without food, blood glucose rose by 21% (P < 0.01) while changes in plasma acyl ghrelin (+41%) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (+37%) were not significant. Two tail pinches (45 min apart) activate pontine and hindbrain catecholaminergic and hypothalamic paraventricular CRF neurons. After 14 days of repeated tail pinch, the 5-min orexigenic response was not significantly different from days 2 to 11 but reduced by 50% thereafter (P < 0.001). Simultaneously, the 5-min fecal pellet output increased during the last 5 days compared with the first 5 days (+58%, P < 0.05). At day 14, the body weight gain was reduced by 22%, with a 99% inhibition of fat gain and a 25% reduction in lean mass (P < 0.05). The orexigenic response to acute 5-min tail pinch is likely to involve the activation of brain NPY1 signaling, whereas that of CRF tends to dampen the acute response and may contribute to increased defecation and decreased body weight gain induced by repeated tail pinch.

Indexed as

AnimalsArginineBody WeightBrainCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneEatingGhrelinMaleNeuronsNeuropeptide YPeptide FragmentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneSomatostatinArginineastressin BBIBP 3226Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneGhrelinNeuropeptide YPeptide FragmentsReceptors, Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneSomatostatinbody weightcorticotropin releasing factorfecal pellet outputfood intakeFosghrelinneuropeptide Ysomatostatin receptor 2 antagoniststress-induced eatingtail pinch

Identifiers

PMID24338440
PMCPMC3921301
OpenAlexW2052816056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.