ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Prognostic value of mutational characteristics in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single-center experience in 275 cases.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Profiling ofCancers · 2024Article
- Deep learning predicts patients outcome and mutations from digitized histology slides in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical-radiomics-based treatment decision support for KIT Exon 11 deletion in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-institutional retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: associations between contrast-enhanced CT images and KIT exon 11 gene mutation.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Mutational characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A single-center analysis of 302 patients.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells and PD-L1 Expression in Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Prognostic impact of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for surgically resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Medicine · 2019Article
- Standard Approach to Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors - Differences between China and Europe.Visceral medicine · 2018Review
- Oncogene mutational analysis in Chinese gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Chinese consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2017Article
- Combination of PLR, MLR, MWR, and Tumor Size Could Significantly Increase the Prognostic Value for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Medicine · 2016Article
- Evaluation of selected interleukins in patients with different gastric neoplasms: a preliminary report.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Treatment and Prognoses in Patients With Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ≥10 cm: A Single-Institution Experience in China.Medicine · 2015Observational
- Sphincter sparing resection of a large obstructive distal rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour after neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib (Glivec).BMJ case reports · 2015Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: 15-years' experience in a single center.BMC surgery · 2014Article
- Evaluation of high-risk clinicopathological indicators in gastrointestinal stromal tumors for prognosis and imatinib treatment outcome.BMC gastroenterology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of KIT/PDGFRA mutations on the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). In the present study, genotype analyses were performed based on GIST samples from 275 patients. The relationship between mutation and clinicopathological characteristics were explored. All factors were evaluated for their impacts on relapse-free survival (RFS). Briefly, the results of genotype analyses showed that mutations were identified in 258 (93.8 %) patients, and deletion was the most frequent type of mutation accounting for 47.3 % (122/258) of all mutation cases, followed by substitution (87/258, 33.7 %) and duplication (49/258, 19.0 %). Moreover, for KIT exon 11 mutation, the most frequently involved area was from codon 557 to 560. Deep analyses showed that the mutation types were correlated with tumor location (P = 0.005), tumor size (P = 0.022), mitosis rate (P < 0.001), risk grade (P < 0.001), and relapse (P = 0.004). Furthermore, delW557-K558 correlated with mitosis rate (P = 0.042) and relapse (P = 0.036), and delTyr568/570 correlated with tumor origin (P = 0.018). Most importantly, mitotic rate [HR = 2.901 (95 % CI 1.094-7.695), P = 0.032] and risk grade [HR = 9.629 (95 % CI 1.997-46.416), P = 0.005] would be the representative traditional prognostic factors, and deletion with >3 codons would be an novel independent predictor of poor outcome for RFS in GIST patients with deletion mutation of KIT exon 11 [HR = 7.970 (95 % CI 1.774-35.803), P = 0.007]. All results indicated that mutation determined clinicopathological features and prognosis of GISTs, and more than three codons involvement may be a novel adverse indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24338275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.