Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24337913›Full record

SynthesisJapanese journal of radiology2014

Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental F18-FDG breast uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Francesco Bertagna, Giorgio Treglia, Emanuela Orlando, Lodovica Dognini, Luca Giovanella, Ramin Sadeghi, Raffaele Giubbini

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Japanese journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Physiological distribution ofThe journal of spinal cord medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Prevalence and risk of malignancy of focal incidental uptake detected by fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the parotid gland: a meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of diagnostic performance of [Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Definitions of Incidental [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. The Role of PET/CT in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco BertagnaNuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy, francesco.bertagna@spedalicivili.brescia.it.
Giorgio Treglia
Emanuela Orlando
Lodovica Dognini
Luca Giovanella
Ramin Sadeghi
Raffaele Giubbini
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITInstitute of Oncology Research · CHMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to analyse the published data on the prevalence and clinical significance of breast incidental F18-FDG uptake detected by PET or PET/CT (BIU). A comprehensive computer literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Embase databases for studies on BIU published through July 2013 was performed. Pooled prevalence and malignancy risk of BIU were calculated. The literature search revealed 42 articles, and 17 were selected. One study was excluded because of data overlap but four additional studies were found screening the references. Finally, 20 articles were included in the systematic review and 13 were eligible for a meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of BIU on all scans was 0.4 % (95 % CI 0.23-0.61 %), the pooled prevalence on scans on female patients only was 0.82 % (95 % CI 0.51-1.2 %), the pooled risk of malignancy of BIU when further analysed was 48 % (95 % CI 38-58 %) and the pooled risk of malignancy of BIU with histological examination was 60 % (95 % CI 53-66 %). The most frequent malignant lesion detected was infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Despite being rare, the identification of BIU frequently signals the presence of an unsuspected subclinical lesion, which differs from the indicated reason for which the patient was initially scanned, and the risk of malignancy is very high.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPrevalenceTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID24337913
OpenAlexW2046271881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.