ReviewProtoplasma2014
Development of FRET biosensors for mammalian and plant systems.
Review in Protoplasma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time visualization of STAT activation in live cells using genetically encoded biosensors.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Optimization of FRET imaging in Arabidopsis protoplasts.Molecules and cells · 2025Article
- A biosensor for the direct visualization of auxin.Nature · 2021Article
- Simultaneous readout of multiple FRET pairs using photochromism.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Optimizing FRET-FLIM Labeling Conditions to Detect Nuclear Protein Interactions at Native Expression Levels in Living Arabidopsis Roots.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- An in vivo biosensing, biomimetic electrochemical transistor with applications in plant science and precision farming.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Characterization of a spectrally diverse set of fluorescent proteins as FRET acceptors for mTurquoise2.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A Toolbox of Genetically Encoded FRET-Based Biosensors for Rapid l-Lysine Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Design of a Water Soluble Fluorescent 3-Hydroxy-4-Pyridinone Ligand Active at Physiological pH Values.Journal of fluorescence · 2016Article
- A New Generation of FRET Sensors for Robust Measurement of Gαi1, Gαi2 and Gαi3 Activation Kinetics in Single Cells.PloS one · 2016Article
- A Perspective on Studying G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling with Resonance Energy Transfer Biosensors in Living Organisms.Molecular pharmacology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically encoded biosensors are increasingly used in visualising signalling processes in different organisms. Sensors based on green fluorescent protein technology are providing a great opportunity for using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) as a tool that allows for monitoring dynamic processes in living cells. The development of these FRET biosensors requires careful selection of fluorophores, substrates and recognition domains. In this review, we will discuss recent developments, strategies to create and optimise FRET biosensors and applications of FRET-based biosensors for use in the two major eukaryotic kingdoms and elaborate on different methods for FRET detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24337770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.