Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2014
The effect of desflurane versus propofol on regional cerebral oxygenation in the sitting position for shoulder arthroscopy.
Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Article
- Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane and Sevoflurane on Cerebral Oxygen Saturation in Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Study.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2019Article
- Cerebral Desaturation Events During Shoulder Arthroscopy in the Beach Chair Position.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2019Review
- The effect of anesthetic agents on cerebral vasospasms after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2018Article
- Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2014 end of year summary: near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2015Review
- Near-infrared spectroscopy for the evaluation of anesthetic depth.BioMed research international · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sitting position may cause significant hemodynamic instability and cerebral hypoperfusion. We investigated the effects of desflurane and propofol on regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2) in the sitting position during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Forty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the sitting position were randomly allocated to the desflurane group (n = 20) or the propofol group (n = 20). Anesthetic agents were maintained and adjusted with the effect-site concentration of propofol (2-3.5 μg/ml) or desflurane (4-7 vol%) to obtain a bispectral index (BIS) of 40-50. The hemodynamic variables, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (ETCO2) and rSO2 were measured and evaluated. There were no differences in BIS, hemodynamic variables and ETCO2 between the groups. The rSO2 values in the desflurane group were higher compared to the propofol group at 3, 5, 7 and 9 min after the sitting position (P = 0.031, 0.047, 0.025 and 0.034, respectively). However, it decreased significantly from the baseline values at 3, 5, 7 and 9 min after the sitting position in both groups (P < 0.001). The change in rSO2 across time was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.183). The incidence of rSO2 <75% of the baseline values after the sitting position was similar between the groups (0 and 10% in the desflurane and propofol group, respectively, P = 0.487). When anesthetized patients were raised to the sitting position, desflurane preserved cerebral oxygenation better than propofol at equipotent concentrations in terms of BIS. However, both anesthetics were associated with significant decrease in the rSO2 values during the sitting position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.