Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24337655›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2014

Improving genetic risk prediction by leveraging pleiotropy.

Cong Li, Can Yang, Joel Gelernter, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Robust angle-based transfer learning in high dimensions.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cong LiProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA, cong.li@yale.edu.
Can Yang
Joel Gelernter
Hongyu Zhao

Funding

Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
Deep sequencing studies for cannabis and stimulant dependenceR01DA030976 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EHLERS, CINDY L, GELERNTER, JOEL · 2010 to 2014
$16.5M
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH059571 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GEJMAN, PABLO V. · 1999 to 2007
$8.0M
Linkage Disequilibrium Studies of Alcohol DependenceR01AA011330 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 1997 to 2013
$6.4M
A Genome-Wide Association Study of SchizophreniaU01MH079469 · NIMH · NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM · PI GEJMAN, PABLO V. · 2007 to 2009
$4.4M
STATISTICAL METHODS TO MAP GENES FOR COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM059507 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HONGYU · 1999 to 2013
$3.6M
COLLABORATIVE GENOMIC STUDY OF BIPOLAR DISORDERR01MH059534 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RICE, JOHN P. · 1998 to 2007
$3.1M
Genetics of Alcohol Dependence in African-AmericansR01AA017535 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH060879 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CLONINGER, C. ROBERT · 1999 to 2006
$2.7M
COLLABORATIVE GENOMIC STUDY OF BIPOLAR DISORDERR01MH059545 · NIMH · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI NURNBERGER, JOHN I · 1998 to 2007
$2.6M
COLLABORATIVE GENOMIC STUDY OF BIPOLAR DISORDERR01MH059533 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MACKINNON, DEAN FREDERICK · 1998 to 2007
$2.4M
COLLABORATIVE GENOMIC STUDY OF BIPOLAR DISORDERR01MH060068 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI BYERLEY, WILLIAM · 1998 to 2007
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002810NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NCRR NIH HHS RR19895NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019895NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG005718NIAAA NIH HHS AA017535NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011330NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017535NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA11330NIDA NIH HHS DA030976NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030976NIGMS NIH HHS GM59507NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059507NIMH NIH HHS 1Z01MH002810-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059533NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059534NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059535NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059545NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059548NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059553NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059556NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059565NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059566NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059567NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059571NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059586NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059587NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059588NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060870NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060879NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061675NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067257NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081800NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59533NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59535NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59545NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59553NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59565NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59566NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59567NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59571NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59586NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59587NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH59588NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH60068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH60870NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH60879NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH61675NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH67257NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH81800NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH046276NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH046318NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH079469NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH079470NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH46274NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH46280NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH46282NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH46289NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH79469NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH79470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important task of human genetics studies is to predict accurately disease risks in individuals based on genetic markers, which allows for identifying individuals at high disease risks, and facilitating their disease treatment and prevention. Although hundreds of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted on many complex human traits in recent years, there has been only limited success in translating these GWAS data into clinically useful risk prediction models. The predictive capability of GWAS data is largely bottlenecked by the available training sample size due to the presence of numerous variants carrying only small to modest effects. Recent studies have shown that different human traits may share common genetic bases. Therefore, an attractive strategy to increase the training sample size and hence improve the prediction accuracy is to integrate data from genetically correlated phenotypes. Yet, the utility of genetic correlation in risk prediction has not been explored in the literature. In this paper, we analyzed GWAS data for bipolar and related disorders and schizophrenia with a bivariate ridge regression method, and found that jointly predicting the two phenotypes could substantially increase prediction accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also found similar prediction accuracy improvements when we jointly analyzed GWAS data for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The empirical observations were substantiated through our comprehensive simulation studies, suggesting that a gain in prediction accuracy can be obtained by combining phenotypes with relatively high genetic correlations. Through both real data and simulation studies, we demonstrated pleiotropy can be leveraged as a valuable asset that opens up a new opportunity to improve genetic risk prediction in the future.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24337655
PMCPMC3988249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.