Trial reportJournal of clinical immunology2014
A randomized phase II study of autologous cytokine-induced killer cells in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Trial report in Journal of clinical immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2022Guideline
- 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Guideline
- 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Gut and liver · 2019Guideline
- Pooled it
- Specific immunotherapy in hepatocellular cancer: A systematic review.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017Pooled it
- Efficacy of cytokine-induced killer cell infusion as an adjuvant immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017Pooled it
- Timely meta-analysis on the efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative therapy.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Clinical application of cytokine-induced killer cells in cancer immunotherapy.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Postoperative adjuvant management in hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of therapeutic efficacy and prognostic outcomes.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Spatial heterogeneity of the hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment determines the efficacy of immunotherapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Adjuvant Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Treatment: Several Unanswered Questions.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2024Review
- Review
- Impact of inflammation and the immune system on hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- The State of Systematic Therapies in Clinic for Hepatobiliary Cancers.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Review
- 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of liver cancer · 2023Review
- Adjuvant therapy following curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: current dilemmas and prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Immunophenotype and antitumor activity of cytokine-induced killer cells from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.PloS one · 2023Article
- Current insights into the hepatic microenvironment and advances in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis prospective study aims to explore the benefit of cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, which has not yet been thoroughly studied before.
methodsFrom January 2004 to May 2009, 132 patients who were initially diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A, B or C, Child-Pugh scores of A or B and without prior treatment were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 (n = 66) to receive CIK treatment plus standard treatment, or arm 2 (n = 66) to receive standard treatment only. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival as evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses and treatment hazard ratios with the Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsThe 1-year (OS: 74.2% vs. 50.0%, 95% CI: 63.6-84.8% vs. 37.8-62.2, p = 0.002), 2-year (OS: 53.0% vs. 30.3%, 95% CI: 40.8-65.2% vs. 19.1-41.5%, p = 0.002), 3-year (OS: 42.4% vs. 24.2%, 95% CI: 30.4-54.4% vs. 13.8-34.6%, p = 0.005) and median overall and progression-free survivals of arm 1 patients were significantly higher than those of arm 2. Therefore, in patients who are not suitable for surgery, significant benefit is obtained from CIK treatment. The main adverse effects of CIK included fever, allergy and headache pain.
conclusionsHepatocellular carcinoma patients who were not suitable for surgery demonstrate prolonged overall and progression-free survival from CIK treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24337625What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.