Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24337615›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2014

Interrater reliability of assessing levator ani deficiency with 360° 3D endovaginal ultrasound.

G Rostaminia, J Manonai, E Leclaire, F Omoumi, M Marchiorlatti, L H Quiroz, S A Shobeiri

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Female pelvic floor protection-Where do we have to go?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Imaging the pelvic floor.Techniques in coloproctology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New Measures for Predicting Birth-Related Pelvic Floor Trauma.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
    Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G RostaminiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
J Manonai
E Leclaire
F Omoumi
M Marchiorlatti
L H Quiroz
S A Shobeiri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThree-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound has been used for evaluation of levator ani muscle deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess interrater agreement/reliability of 3D endovaginal ultrasound for scoring levator ani deficiency (LAD).

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study. Women referred to our urogynecology clinic for different pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms during November 2010-November 2012 were recruited. All patients underwent physical examination, including Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination and high-resolution 3D endovaginal ultrasound. The levator muscle was divided into three subgroups based on our prior work: the puboperinealis/puboanalis (PA), puborectalis (PR), and iliococcygeus/pubococcygeus (PV). Subgroups were evaluated in their specific axial plane and were scored according to thickness and detachment from the pubic bone. Scoring was conducted by four raters blinded to case status and to one another's scores.

resultsNinety patients were recruited. The median age was 52 (range 24-86). Median body mass index (BMI) was 28.08 (range 17.08-51.39). Fifty percent of patients were menopausal. The range of exact agreement for total LAD score was 77-90 %. All the correlation coefficients at the individual sites as well as the overall scores were positive at above 0.63 and significant at <0.0001 level.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates excellent agreement between raters assessing levator ani muscle deficiency using 3D endovaginal ultrasound. This level of concordance supports the reliability of the 3D endovaginal ultrasound technique and scoring method among raters [corrected].

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEndosonographyFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMiddle AgedObserver VariationPelvic FloorReproducibility of ResultsVaginaYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.