Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24337609›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2014

Multimodal MR imaging model to predict tumor infiltration in patients with gliomas.

Christopher R Durst, Prashant Raghavan, Mark E Shaffrey, David Schiff, M Beatriz Lopes, Jason P Sheehan, Nicholas J Tustison, James T Patrie, Wenjun Xin, W Jeff Elias and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imaging-Based Algorithm for the Local Grading of Glioma.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Estimating Local Cellular Density in Glioma Using MR Imaging Data.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R DurstUniversity of Virginia Health Systems, Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, PO Box 800170, FedEx:1215 Lee Street-New Hospital, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA, cdurst@virginia.edu.
Prashant Raghavan
Mark E Shaffrey
David Schiff
M Beatriz Lopes
Jason P Sheehan
Nicholas J Tustison
James T Patrie
Wenjun Xin
W Jeff Elias
Kenneth C Liu
Greg A Helm
A Cupino
Max Wintermark
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · USLoma Linda University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGliomas remain difficult to treat, in part, due to our inability to accurately delineate the margins of the tumor. The goal of our study was to evaluate if a combination of advanced MR imaging techniques and a multimodal imaging model could be used to predict tumor infiltration in patients with diffuse gliomas.

methodsInstitutional review board approval and written consent were obtained. This prospective pilot study enrolled patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy for a suspected de novo glioma. Stereotactic biopsy coordinates were coregistered with multiple standard and advanced neuroimaging sequences in 10 patients. Objective imaging values were assigned to the biopsy sites for each of the imaging sequences. A principal component analysis was performed to reduce the dimensionality of the imaging dataset without losing important information. A univariate analysis was performed to identify the statistically relevant principal components. Finally, a multivariate analysis was used to build the final model describing nuclear density.

resultsA univariate analysis identified three principal components as being linearly associated with the observed nuclear density (p values 0.021, 0.016, and 0.046, respectively). These three principal component composite scores are predominantly comprised of DTI (mean diffusivity or average diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy) and PWI data (rMTT, Ktrans). The p value of the model was <0.001. The correlation between the predicted and observed nuclear density was 0.75.

conclusionA multi-input, single output imaging model may predict the extent of glioma invasion with significant correlation with histopathology.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleGliomaHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm Invasiveness

Identifiers

PMID24337609
OpenAlexW2062291561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.