Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24337444›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2014

Effects of Medicare Part D on guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy for bipolar I disorder among dual beneficiaries.

Marguerite E Burns, Alisa B Busch, Jeanne M Madden, Robert F Le Cates, Fang Zhang, Alyce S Adams, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Stephen B Soumerai, Haiden A Huskamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marguerite E Burns
Alisa B Busch
Jeanne M Madden
Robert F Le Cates
Fang Zhang
Alyce S Adams
Dennis Ross-Degnan
Stephen B Soumerai
Haiden A Huskamp
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Drug Cost Containment Changes and Quality of Care for Mentally Ill Dual EnrolleesR01HS018577 · AHRQ · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI SOUMERAI, STEPHEN B · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
Impact of Medicare Part D on Cancer and Diabetes Disparities among Dual EnrolleesR01AG032249 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ADAMS, ALYCE SOPHIA · 2009 to 2011
$1.5M
Converting Public Health Insurance into Guideline-Concordant Mental Health CareK01MH092338 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNS, MARGUERITE ELIZABETH · 2011 to 2015
$843k
AHRQ HHS 1R01-HS018577-01AHRQ HHS R01 HS018577NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NIA NIH HHS 5R01AG032249NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032249NIMH NIH HHS 1K01MH092338NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH092338NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn January 2006 insurance coverage for medications shifted from Medicaid to Medicare Part D private drug plans for the six million individuals enrolled in both programs. Dual beneficiaries faced new formularies and utilization management policies. It is unclear whether Part D, compared with Medicaid, relaxed or tightened psychiatric medication management, which could affect receipt of recommended pharmacotherapy, and emergency department use related to treatment discontinuities. This study examined the impact of the transition from Medicaid to Part D on guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy for bipolar I disorder and emergency department use.

methodsUsing interrupted-time-series analysis and Medicaid and Medicare administrative data from 2004 to 2007, the authors analyzed the effect of the coverage transition on receipt of guideline-concordant antimanic medication, guideline-discordant antidepressant monotherapy, and emergency department visits for a nationally representative continuous cohort of 1,431 adults with diagnosed bipolar I disorder.

resultsSixteen months after the transition to Part D, the proportion of the population with any recommended use of antimanic drugs was an estimated 3.1 percentage points higher than expected once analyses controlled for baseline trends. The monthly proportion of beneficiaries with seven or more days of antidepressant monotherapy was 2.1 percentage points lower than expected. The number of emergency department visits per month temporarily increased by 19% immediately posttransition.

conclusionsIncreased receipt of guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy for bipolar I disorder may reflect relatively less restrictive management of antimanic medications under Part D. The clinical significance of the change is unclear, given the small effect sizes. However, increased emergency department visits merit attention for the Medicaid beneficiaries who continue to transition to Part D.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Services ResearchHumansInsurance CoverageMaleMedicaidMedicare Part DMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24337444
PMCPMC4038978
OpenAlexW2159266430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.