ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2013
[Economic effects of chronic pain in childhood and adolescence: self-assessment of health care costs for affected families before and after a multidisciplinary inpatient pain therapy].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of chronic pain on adolescents and their families: A qualitative investigation of parental perspectives.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2025Article
- Sensory processing sensitivity in adolescents reporting chronic pain: an exploratory study.Pain reports · 2023Article
- [Definition, diagnostics and therapy of chronic widespread pain and the (so-called) fibromyalgia syndrome in children and adolescents : Updated guidelines 2017].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Review
- [Pain-related parental behavior : Maternal and paternal responses to chronic pain of their child and modifications following inpatient interdisciplinary pain treatment].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Article
- Chronic pain treatment in children and adolescents: less is good, more is sometimes better.BMC pediatrics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic pain in children and adolescents causes a high utilization of the health care system and thereby significant costs. The aim of the present study is to describe the economic effects of pediatric chronic pain from the family's perspective. MATERIAL AND
methodsSix months before and 6 and 12 months after a 3-week inpatient-based intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment, the parents of 101 children with chronic pain filled in a standardized cost questionnaire containing the following parameters: (1) child's utilization of medical and social services, (2) subjective financial burden, and (3) type and extent of direct costs.
resultsDuring the 6 months before inpatient-based intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment, children used a median of four different services. After inpatient pain treatment, service utilization has been reduced significantly (p < 0.001). One fifth of the families report a high or very high financial burden before treatment. Family's direct costs are most often caused by travelling (86 %) and drugs (60 %). After inpatient pain treatment, family's financial burden decreased significantly (p < 0.001). The frequency of additional expenditures is also reduced after treatment: parents report less additional costs due to travelling and drugs (p < 0.001, respectively).
conclusionThe present study emphasizes the pronounced utilization of health and social care due to pediatric chronic pain. In the future, the use of appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic standards that contribute to avoiding unnecessary and expensive interventions is preferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.