Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24337115›Full record

ArticleBiology open2013

Damage to the Drosophila follicle cell epithelium produces "false clones" with apparent polarity phenotypes.

Timm Haack, Dan T Bergstralh, Daniel St Johnston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of integrins inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Studying Mitochondrial Structure and Function in Drosophila Ovaries.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Mosaic Analysis of Stem Cell Lineages in the Drosophila Ovary.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Methods for studying oogenesis.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Control of Germline Stem Cell Lineages by Diet and Physiology.Results and problems in cell differentiation
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timm HaackThe Gurdon Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Dan T Bergstralh
Daniel St Johnston
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 080007Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila follicular epithelium, which surrounds developing egg chambers, is a well-established model for studying epithelial polarity because it is continuously generated from adult stem cells, making it easy to generate homozygous mutant clones in a heterozygous background. Mutant clones are usually marked by the loss of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) expression, which distinguishes them from their green, wild-type neighbours. Here we report that damage to the epithelium during dissection can produce groups of GFP-negative cells that resemble mutant clones. Furthermore, several polarity factors, such as aPKC and Discs large, are not localised in these damage-induced false clones. This phenotype is identical to that reported for several mutants, including ampk and Dystroglycan mutant clones under conditions of energetic stress. Using more reliable systems to mark ampk and Dystroglycan null clones such as the MARCM system, we found that neither protein is required for epithelial polarity under low energy conditions. Thus, our previous report of a specific low energy polarity pathway is an artefact of the increased damage caused by dissecting the small ovaries of starved flies. However, ampk mutant cells are larger than normal under both starvation and well-fed conditions, indicating that AMPK restricts follicle cell growth even when dietary sugar is not limiting. We suspect that several other reports of mutants that disrupt follicle cell polarity may also be based on the phenotype of damage-induced false clones, and recommend the use of positively marked clones to avoid this potential artefact.

Indexed as

DrosophilaFalse clonesFollicle cell epitheliaPolarity

Identifiers

PMID24337115
PMCPMC3863415
OpenAlexW2140877665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.