Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24337077›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2014

Examining the effects of initial smoking abstinence on response to smoking-related stimuli and response inhibition in a human laboratory model.

Matthew P Bradstreet, Stephen T Higgins, F Joseph McClernon, Rachel V Kozink, Joan M Skelly, Yukiko Washio, Alexa A Lopez, Marie A Parry

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tobacco withdrawal among opioid-dependent smokers.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew P BradstreetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Stephen T Higgins
F Joseph McClernon
Rachel V Kozink
Joan M Skelly
Yukiko Washio
Alexa A Lopez
Marie A Parry

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI KHADANGA, SHERRIE · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
TRAINING IN BEHAV. PHARMACOLOGY OF HUMAN DRUG DEPENDENCET32DA007242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H, HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1990 to 2025
$8.2M
Modeling Initial Smoking Abstinence and Relapse RiskR01DA008076 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1993 to 2010
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA008076NIDA NIH HHS R01DA008076NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007242NIDA NIH HHS T32DA07242NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleResearch is needed on initial smoking abstinence and relapse risk.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the effects of different durations of initial abstinence on sensitivity to smoking-related stimuli and response inhibition in the context of a larger battery of outcome measures.

methodsSmokers were randomly assigned to receive payment contingent on smoking abstinence across all 15 study days (15C) or just the final 2 days (2C). Smoking status and subject ratings were assessed daily. Participants completed fMRI sessions at baseline and day 14 during which they completed craving ratings after exposure to smoking-related and neutral stimuli and performed a response inhibition task. On day 15, participants completed a smoking preference session involving 20 exclusive choices between smoking and money.

resultsThe payment contingencies were effective in producing greater smoking abstinence in the 15C vs. 2C conditions. Ratings of withdrawal decreased, while ratings of ease and confidence in abstaining increased in the 15C vs. 2C conditions across the 15-day study. 15C participants were less likely to choose the smoking option in the preference session. 15C participants reported greater reductions in craving compared to the 2C participants in the presence of smoking-related and neutral stimuli (i.e., decreases in generalized craving), but no differences were noted in cue reactivity per se or in response inhibition.

conclusionsResults systematically replicate prior observations that a period 2 weeks of initial abstinence decreases the relative reinforcing effects of smoking and improves other outcomes associated with relapse risk compared to the initial day or two of a cessation effort, and extends them by underscoring the importance of generalized rather than cue-induced craving in relation to relapse risk during the initial weeks of smoking cessation.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24337077
PMCPMC4123458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.