ArticleDer Anaesthesist2014
[Out-of-hospital emergency medicine in Germany, Austria and Switzerland : randomized prospective studies from 1990 to 2012].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome, quality of life and direct costs after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in an urban region of Switzerland.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2019Observational
- [Reform of emergency physician training in Austria : Finally up to date?]Der Anaesthesist · 2018Review
- [German Resuscitation Register : lots of quality management at low cost].Der Anaesthesist · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnly randomized clinical trials can improve the outcome of life-threatening injuries or diseases but observations from England and North America suggest that the number of such randomized clinical trials is decreasing. In this study contributions from German speaking countries with regards to randomized clinical trials in emergency medicine over the last 22 years were investigated.
methodsThe Medline database was searched from January 1990 to December 2012 for prospective randomized clinical trials in the prehospital setting using the criteria "cardiac arrest", "cardiopulmonary resuscitation", "multiple trauma", "hemorrhagic shock", "head trauma", "stroke" as well as myocardial infarction and emergency medical service. Only studies originating from Germany, Austria or Switzerland were included.
resultsA total of 474 studies were found and 25 studies (5.3 %) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the last 22 years German speaking countries have published approximately one prospective, randomized, clinical trial per year on prehospital emergency medicine. The median number of patients included in the trials was 159 (minimum 16, maximum 1,219). Most (80 %) studies originated from Germany and most (64 %) studies were conducted by anesthesiology departments. Cardiac arrest was the most frequent subject of the investigated studies. Approximately 50 % of the studies had financial support from industrial companies.
conclusionA significant increase or decrease in the number of prospective randomized clinical trials in the out-of-hospital setting could not be found in German speaking countries despite the fact that the absolute numbers of studies had increased. Only about one prospective, randomized clinical trial with an emergency medicine core tracer diagnosis originated from Germany, Austria and Switzerland per year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.