Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24336575›Full record

SynthesisBMJ quality & safety2014

Promoting engagement by patients and families to reduce adverse events in acute care settings: a systematic review.

Zackary Berger, Tabor E Flickinger, Elizabeth Pfoh, Kathryn A Martinez, Sydney M Dy

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ quality & safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Towards understanding and improving medication safety for patients with mental illness in primary care: A multimethod study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The elephant in the room: Exploring the influence and participation of patients in infection-related care across surgical pathways in South Africa and India.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zackary BergerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tabor E FlickingerDivision of General Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Elizabeth PfohDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kathryn A MartinezDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sydney M DyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USAnn Arbor VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

PHS HHS HHSA-290-2007-10062I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient-centeredness is central to healthcare. Hospitals should address patients' unique needs to improve safety and quality. Patient engagement in healthcare, which may help prevent adverse events, can be approached as an independent patient safety practice (PSP) or as part of a multifactorial PSP.

objectivesThis review examines how interventions encouraging this engagement have been implemented in controlled trials.

methodsWe searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane from 2000 to 2012 for English language studies in hospital settings with prospective controlled designs, addressing the effectiveness or implementation of patient/family engagement in PSPs. We separately reviewed interventions implemented as part of selected broader PSPs by way of example: hand hygiene, ventilator-associated pneumonia, rapid response systems and care transitions.

resultsSix articles met the inclusion criteria for effectiveness with a primary focus on patient engagement. We identified 12 studies implementing patient engagement as an aspect of selected broader PSPs. A number of studies relied on patients' possible function as a reporter of error to healthcare workers and patients as a source of reminders regarding safety behaviours, while others relied on direct activation of patients or families. Definitions of patient and family engagement were lacking, as well as evidence regarding the types of patients who might feel comfortable engaging with providers, and in what contexts.

conclusionsWhile patient engagement in safety is appealing, there is insufficient high-quality evidence informing real-world implementation. Further work should evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on patient and family engagement and clarify the added benefit of incorporating engagement in multifaceted approaches to improve patient safety endpoints. In addition, strategies to assess and overcome barriers to patients' willingness to actively engage in their care should be investigated.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyProfessional-Patient RelationsCommunicable Disease ControlHand DisinfectionHealth PromotionHumansMedication ErrorsPatient-Centered CareProfessional-Family RelationsHospital MedicinePatient-Centred CarePatient EducationPatient safetyQuality Improvement Methodologies

Identifiers

PMID24336575
PMCPMC4079036
OpenAlexW2137375853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.