Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24336482›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

The standing pool of genomic structural variation in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus.

Lex E Flagel, John H Willis, Todd J Vision

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extensive genome-wide duplications in the eastern oyster (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Copy number variation and disease resistance in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lex E FlagelDepartment of Biology, Duke University.
John H Willis
Todd J Vision

Funding

Genomic Analysis of Complex Trait Variation in MimulusR01GM073990 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI KELLY, JOHN K · 2006 to 2015
$2.6M
Phylogenetic Analysis with Complex Genome Rearrangement EventsR01GM078991 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI TANG, JIJUN · 2006 to 2009
$715k
Discovering Genome Evolution in a Model System for Plant Ecological GenomicsF32GM090763 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FLAGEL, LEX EVAN · 2010 to 2012
$103k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM090763NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM090763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073990NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM073990-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078991NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM078991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major unresolved questions in evolutionary genetics include determining the contributions of different mutational sources to the total pool of genetic variation in a species, and understanding how these different forms of genetic variation interact with natural selection. Recent work has shown that structural variants (SVs) (insertions, deletions, inversions, and transpositions) are a major source of genetic variation, often outnumbering single nucleotide variants in terms of total bases affected. Despite the near ubiquity of SVs, major questions about their interaction with natural selection remain. For example, how does the allele frequency spectrum of SVs differ when compared with single nucleotide variants? How often do SVs affect genes, and what are the consequences? To begin to address these questions, we have systematically identified and characterized a large set of submicroscopic insertion and deletion (indel) variants (between 1 and 200 kb in length) among ten inbred lines from a single natural population of the plant species Mimulus guttatus. After extensive computational filtering, we focused on a set of 4,142 high-confidence indels that showed an experimental validation rate of 73%. All but one of these indels were less than 200 kb. Although the largest were generally at lower frequencies in the population, a surprising number of large indels are at intermediate frequencies. Although indels overlapping with genes were much rarer than expected by chance, approximately 600 genes were affected by an indel. Nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) defense response genes were the most enriched among the gene families affected. Most indels associated with genes were rare and appeared to be under purifying selection, though we do find four high-frequency derived insertion alleles that show signatures of recent positive selection.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomic Structural VariationGene FrequencyINDEL MutationLeucine-Rich Repeat ProteinsMimulusPlant ProteinsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteinsSelection, GeneticLeucine-Rich Repeat ProteinsPlant ProteinsProteinsindelMimulus guttatusnatural selectionpopulation genomicsstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID24336482
PMCPMC3914686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.