Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24336164›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2014

The immunogenicity of cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Xuemei Fu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. New treatment methods for myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Stem cell-based therapy for human diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Adult Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration and Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  12. [Research progress on the donor cell sources of pancreatic islet transplantation for treatment of diabetes mellitus].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CMI: Highlights in last three years.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. iPS cell transplantation for traumatic spinal cord injury.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xuemei Fu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With their ability to undergo unlimited self-renewal in culture and to differentiate into all cell types in the body, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) hold great potential for the treatment of currently incurable diseases. Two hESC-based cell therapies for spinal cord injury and macular degeneration have been advanced into human clinical trials. Despite this rapid progress, one key challenge of hESC-based cell therapy is the allogeneic immune rejection of hESC-derived cells by recipients. This problem could be mitigated by a recent breakthrough in the technology of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by nuclear reprogramming of patient-specific somatic cells with defined factors, which could become a renewable source of autologous cells for cell therapy. However, recent studies revealing the abnormal epigenetics, genomic stability and immunogenicity of iPSCs have raised safety concerns over iPSC-based therapy. Recent findings related to the immunogenicity of iPSC derivatives will be summarized in this review.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAnimalsCellular ReprogrammingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID24336164
PMCPMC4002141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.