Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24336059›Full record

ReviewThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2014

Dosing schedules for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: considerations for policy makers.

Cynthia G Whitney, David Goldblatt, Katherine L O'Brien

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PCV13, PCV15 or PCV20: Which vaccine is best for children in terms of immunogenicity?Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dose-specific Effectiveness of 7- and 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines Against Vaccine-serotype Streptococcus pneumoniae Colonization in Children.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  19. To Boost or Not to Boost? Lessons from the Australian Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination Program.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia G WhitneyFrom the *Respiratory Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, †Institute for Child Health, London, United Kingdom; and ‡International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
David Goldblatt
Katherine L O'Brien
Institute of Child Health · INNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since second generation pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) targeting 10 and 13 serotypes became available in 2010, the number of national policy makers considering these vaccines has steadily increased. An important consideration for a national immunization program is the timing and number of doses-the schedule-that will best prevent disease in the population. Data on disease epidemiology and the efficacy or effectiveness of PCV schedules are typically considered when choosing a schedule. Practical concerns, such as the existing vaccine schedule, and vaccine program performance are also important. In low-income countries, pneumococcal disease and deaths typically peak well before the end of the first year of life, making a schedule that provides PCV doses early in life (eg, a 6-, 10- and 14-week schedule) potentially the best option. In other settings, a schedule including a booster dose may address disease that peaks in the second year of life or may be seen to enhance a schedule already in place. A large and growing body of evidence from immunogenicity studies, as well as clinical trials and observational studies of carriage, pneumonia and invasive disease, has been systematically reviewed; these data indicate that schedules of 3 or 4 doses all work well, and that the differences between these regimens are subtle, especially in a mature program in which coverage is high and indirect (herd) effects help enhance protection provided directly by a vaccine schedule. The recent World Health Organization policy statement on PCVs endorsed a schedule of 3 primary doses without a booster or, as a new alternative, 2 primary doses with a booster dose. While 1 schedule may be preferred in a particular setting based on local epidemiology or practical considerations, achieving high coverage with 3 doses is likely more important than the specific timing of doses.

Indexed as

Health PolicyImmunization ScheduleChild, PreschoolHeptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate VaccineHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesUnited StatesVaccines, Conjugate10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine13-valent pneumococcal vaccineHeptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate VaccinePneumococcal VaccinesVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID24336059
PMCPMC3940379
OpenAlexW2037340641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.