Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24335828›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2014

Distinct microbial communities associated with buried soils in the Siberian tundra.

Antje Gittel, Jiří Bárta, Iva Kohoutová, Robert Mikutta, Sarah Owens, Jack Gilbert, Jörg Schnecker, Birgit Wild, Bjarte Hannisdal, Joeran Maerz and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reduced microbial stability in the active layer is associated with carbon loss under alpine permafrost degradation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Antje Gittel1] Department of Biology, Centre for Geobiology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway [2] Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000000178407861
Jiří BártaDepartment of Ecosystems Biology, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Iva KohoutováDepartment of Ecosystems Biology, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Robert MikuttaInstitut für Bodenkunde, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Sarah Owens1] Institute of Genomics and Systems Biology, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA [2] Computation Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jack Gilbert1] Institute of Genomics and Systems Biology, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA [2] Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jörg Schnecker1] Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria [2] Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Birgit Wild1] Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria [2] Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bjarte HannisdalDepartment of Earth Science, Centre for Geobiology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Joeran MaerzDivision of Ecosystem Modelling, Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Geesthacht, Germany.
Nikolay LashchinskiyCentral Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Petr CapekDepartment of Ecosystems Biology, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Hana SantrůčkováDepartment of Ecosystems Biology, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Norman GentschInstitut für Bodenkunde, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Olga Shibistova1] Institut für Bodenkunde, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany [2] VN Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademgorodok, Russia.
Georg GuggenbergerInstitut für Bodenkunde, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas Richter1] Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria [2] Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Vigdis L TorsvikDepartment of Biology, Centre for Geobiology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Christa Schleper1] Department of Biology, Centre for Geobiology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway [2] Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria [3] Division of Archaea Biology and Ecogenomics, Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tim Urich1] Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria [2] Division of Archaea Biology and Ecogenomics, Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryoturbation, the burial of topsoil material into deeper soil horizons by repeated freeze-thaw events, is an important storage mechanism for soil organic matter (SOM) in permafrost-affected soils. Besides abiotic conditions, microbial community structure and the accessibility of SOM to the decomposer community are hypothesized to control SOM decomposition and thus have a crucial role in SOM accumulation in buried soils. We surveyed the microbial community structure in cryoturbated soils from nine soil profiles in the northeastern Siberian tundra using high-throughput sequencing and quantification of bacterial, archaeal and fungal marker genes. We found that bacterial abundances in buried topsoils were as high as in unburied topsoils. In contrast, fungal abundances decreased with depth and were significantly lower in buried than in unburied topsoils resulting in remarkably low fungal to bacterial ratios in buried topsoils. Fungal community profiling revealed an associated decrease in presumably ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi. The abiotic conditions (low to subzero temperatures, anoxia) and the reduced abundance of fungi likely provide a niche for bacterial, facultative anaerobic decomposers of SOM such as members of the Actinobacteria, which were found in significantly higher relative abundances in buried than in unburied topsoils. Our study expands the knowledge on the microbial community structure in soils of Northern latitude permafrost regions, and attributes the delayed decomposition of SOM in buried soils to specific microbial taxa, and particularly to a decrease in abundance and activity of ECM fungi, and to the extent to which bacterial decomposers are able to act as their functional substitutes.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiodiversityEcosystemSoil MicrobiologyArchaeaBacteriaDNA, Ribosomal SpacerEnzymesFungiGenes, rRNASiberiaSoilDNA, Ribosomal SpacerEnzymesSoil

Identifiers

PMID24335828
PMCPMC3960545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.