Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24335822›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2014

Arterial blood pressure management during carotid endarterectomy and early cognitive dysfunction.

Eric J Heyer, Joanna L Mergeche, Zirka H Anastasian, Minjae Kim, Kaitlin A Mallon, E Sander Connolly

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy - general or loco-regional?Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care · 2015
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric J Heyer*Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, New York; ‡Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York; §Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Joanna L Mergeche
Zirka H Anastasian
Minjae Kim
Kaitlin A Mallon
E Sander Connolly
Columbia University · US

Funding

Neuropsychological Outcome of Carotid EndarterectomyR01AG017604 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HEYER, ERIC JOHN · 2001 to 2012
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017604NIA NIH HHS R01 AG17604-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA common practice during cross-clamp of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is to manage mean arterial pressure (MAP) above baseline to optimize the collateral cerebral blood flow and reduce the risk of ischemic stroke.

objectiveTo determine whether MAP management ≥20% above baseline during cross-clamp is associated with lower risk of early cognitive dysfunction, a subtler form of neurological injury than stroke.

methodsOne hundred eighty-three patients undergoing CEA were enrolled in this ad hoc study. All patients had radial arterial catheters placed before the induction of general anesthesia. MAP was managed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. All patients were evaluated with a battery of neuropsychometric tests preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.

resultsOverall, 28.4% of CEA patients exhibited early cognitive dysfunction (eCD). Significantly fewer patients with MAP ≥20% above baseline during cross-clamp exhibited eCD than those managed <20% above (11.6% vs 38.6%, P < .001). In a multivariate logistic regression model, MAP ≥20% above baseline during the cross-clamp period was associated with significantly lower risk of eCD (odds ratio [OR], 0.18 [0.07-0.40], P < .001), whereas diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.73 [1.14-6.61], P = .03) and each additional year of education (OR, 1.19 [1.06-1.34], P = .003) were associated with significantly higher risk of eCD.

conclusionThe observations of this study suggest that MAP management ≥20% above baseline during cross-clamp of the carotid artery may be associated with lower risk of eCD after CEA. More prospective work is necessary to determine whether MAP ≥20% above baseline during cross-clamp can improve the safety of this commonly performed procedure.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBlood PressureCase-Control StudiesCognition DisordersEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleNeuropsychological TestsPostoperative ComplicationsRegression AnalysisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24335822
PMCPMC4038378
OpenAlexW2017763275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.