Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24335557›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014

Vision-based flight control in the hawkmoth Hyles lineata.

Shane P Windsor, Richard J Bomphrey, Graham K Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Active vision shapes and coordinates flight motor responses in flies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomechanics and biomimetics in insect-inspired flight systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016
    Review
  11. Controlling roll perturbations in fruit flies.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shane P WindsorDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, , South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Richard J Bomphrey
Graham K Taylor

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C518573/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBC5185731European Research Council 204513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision is a key sensory modality for flying insects, playing an important role in guidance, navigation and control. Here, we use a virtual-reality flight simulator to measure the optomotor responses of the hawkmoth Hyles lineata, and use a published linear-time invariant model of the flight dynamics to interpret the function of the measured responses in flight stabilization and control. We recorded the forces and moments produced during oscillation of the visual field in roll, pitch and yaw, varying the temporal frequency, amplitude or spatial frequency of the stimulus. The moths' responses were strongly dependent upon contrast frequency, as expected if the optomotor system uses correlation-type motion detectors to sense self-motion. The flight dynamics model predicts that roll angle feedback is needed to stabilize the lateral dynamics, and that a combination of pitch angle and pitch rate feedback is most effective in stabilizing the longitudinal dynamics. The moths' responses to roll and pitch stimuli coincided qualitatively with these functional predictions. The moths produced coupled roll and yaw moments in response to yaw stimuli, which could help to reduce the energetic cost of correcting heading. Our results emphasize the close relationship between physics and physiology in the stabilization of insect flight.

Indexed as

Vision, OcularAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFeedbackFlight, AnimalLinear ModelsMothsOscillometryflight controlflight dynamicshawkmothHyles lineatainsect flightoptomotor

Identifiers

PMID24335557
PMCPMC3869164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.