ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014
The identification of novel potential injury mechanisms and candidate biomarkers in renal allograft rejection by quantitative proteomics.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Computational Gene Expression Score for Predicting Immune Injury in Renal Allografts.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Urine Exosomal bkv-miR-B1-5p and BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023Trial
- Exfoliated kidney cells from urine for non-invasive kidney transplant monitoring: A potential opportunity?Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
- Identification of ubiquitination-related signature genes for predicting kidney transplant rejection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification of Hub Genes Correlated with the Initiation and Progression of CKD in the Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction Model.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Future of non-invasive graft evaluation: A systematic review of proteomics in kidney transplantation.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Application of the Human Proteome in Disease, Diagnosis, and Translation into Precision Medicine: Current Status and Future Prospects.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Distinct Urinary Proteome Changes Across Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Stages in a Cohort of Black South Africans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Dysfunction: Current and Future Applications in the Era of Precision Medicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Multi-omics Approach in Kidney Transplant: Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Pandemic.Current transplantation reports · 2023Article
- Exosomes as Modulators and Biomarkers of Transplant Immunity.Current transplantation reports · 2023Article
- Proteomic analysis investigating kidney transplantation outcomes- a scoping review.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Biomarkers for Kidney-Transplant Rejection: A Short Review Study.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Contemporary Biomarkers for Renal Transplantation: A Narrative Overview.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Urinary Extracellular Vesicles in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Bench to Bedside?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Kidney Transplantation Rejection.Proteomes · 2022Review
- Omics-based biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of kidney allograft rejection.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2022Review
- Progress in kidney transplantation: The role for systems immunology.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Urine recirculation prolongs normothermic kidney perfusion via more optimal metabolic homeostasis-a proteomics study.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021Article
- Rational selection of a biomarker panel targeting unmet clinical needs in kidney injury.Clinical proteomics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Early transplant dysfunction and failure because of immunological and nonimmunological factors still presents a significant clinical problem for transplant recipients. A critical unmet need is the noninvasive detection and prediction of immune injury such that acute injury can be reversed by proactive immunosuppression titration. In this study, we used iTRAQ -based proteomic discovery and targeted ELISA validation to discover and validate candidate urine protein biomarkers from 262 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed allograft injury. Urine samples were randomly split into a training set of 108 patients and an independent validation set of 154 patients, which comprised the clinical biopsy-confirmed phenotypes of acute rejection (AR) (n = 74), stable graft (STA) (n = 74), chronic allograft injury (CAI) (n = 58), BK virus nephritis (BKVN) (n = 38), nephrotic syndrome (NS) (n = 8), and healthy, normal control (HC) (n = 10). A total of 389 proteins were measured that displayed differential abundances across urine specimens of the injury types (p < 0.05) with a significant finding that SUMO2 (small ubiquitin-related modifier 2) was identified as a "hub" protein for graft injury irrespective of causation. Sixty-nine urine proteins had differences in abundance (p < 0.01) in AR compared with stable graft, of which 12 proteins were up-regulated in AR with a mean fold increase of 2.8. Nine urine proteins were highly specific for AR because of their significant differences (p < 0.01; fold increase >1.5) from all other transplant categories (HLA class II protein HLA-DRB1, KRT14, HIST1H4B, FGG, ACTB, FGB, FGA, KRT7, DPP4). Increased levels of three of these proteins, fibrinogen beta (FGB; p = 0.04), fibrinogen gamma (FGG; p = 0.03), and HLA DRB1 (p = 0.003) were validated by ELISA in AR using an independent sample set. The fibrinogen proteins further segregated AR from BK virus nephritis (FGB p = 0.03, FGG p = 0.02), a finding that supports the utility of monitoring these urinary proteins for the specific and sensitive noninvasive diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.